Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old Chevron precedent, a landmark decision that had granted agencies considerable leeway to interpret statutes. This ruling marks a significant shift in the landscape of administrative law, compelling regulated parties to reassess how agencies maintain their interpretative powers.
Despite the Court’s ruling, agencies are expected to continue shaping the law in various ways. Attorneys at K&L Gates have outlined three primary methods agencies might employ to retain their influence over statutory interpretation and implementation. For a detailed analysis of these strategies, legal professionals can refer to the [Law360 article](https://www.law360.com/articles/1854559/3-ways-agencies-will-keep-making-law-after-chevron) by Varu Chilakamarri, Tre Holloway, and Michael Scanlon.