On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a decades-old precedent known as Chevron deference, which had historically favored federal agencies’ rulemaking interpretations. Legal experts are now analyzing the potential impact this decision may have on future rulemaking and litigation across various practice areas.
One specific area of concern is with the regulations set forth by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The end of Chevron deference could prompt a surge in lawsuits challenging USDA regulations. This may include regulations such as the redefinition of “unfair trade practices” under the Packers and Stockyards Act, or new policies classifying salmonella as an adulterant in certain poultry products, according to expert Bob Hibbert at Wiley.
For more detailed insights into the potential legal ramifications following this significant Supreme Court ruling, readers can refer to the full article by Bob Hibbert on Law360.