The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo has overturned the longstanding Chevron deference, which has historically granted federal agencies significant leeway in interpreting ambiguous statutes. Despite this significant judicial shift, the decision is expected to have a minimal impact on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). According to John Coleman at Orrick, the CFPB’s regulatory activities may remain largely unchanged. This stability could be beneficial for those who prioritize due process, consistency, and predictability within consumer financial services regulation.