Misconceptions about what it means to “think like a lawyer” often start in law school and continue to hinder many attorneys throughout their practice. In a monthly column, Luke Andrews discusses an alternative method of organizing and sequencing legal arguments. This latest installment introduces a two-step process that can enhance the clarity and effectiveness of legal briefs and opinions.
The method is designed to benefit both the drafter and the reader, whether the writer is a rookie brief writer or Chief Justice John Roberts. By framing the governing standard at the outset, and then clarifying how the arguments meet that standard, legal professionals can produce more coherent and persuasive documents.
To explore this innovative approach in more detail, you can read the full column by Luke Andrews here.