In a recent legal development, a Korean skin care company faced a setback in its trademark infringement case against Marc Jacobs. The dispute revolved around the allegation that Marc Jacobs’ Eye-Conic cosmetics infringed on the trademark for Amarte’s Eyeconic anti-aging eye cream. However, a California federal judge ruled in favor of Marc Jacobs Beauty, determining that there was no likelihood of confusion between the two product lines.
For detailed information on the case, you can access the full article on Law360.