By Elizabeth Lowe, Neha Dhindsa, and Maria Stosz (September 24, 2024, 12:41 PM EDT) — On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the longstanding Chevron deference doctrine, which had previously given federal agencies significant latitude in interpreting their regulatory mandates. Despite this pivotal shift, attorneys from Venable argue that courts are likely to continue granting deference to federal authorities on matters of national security.
According to the analysis, agencies with responsibilities in trade, national security, and foreign policy may be less impacted by the end of Chevron deference. Judges have historically shown deference in cases involving these areas, particularly when they touch upon the president’s constitutional authority and international relations. For further details, you can read the full article on Law360.