Federal district courts routinely update their local rules of civil procedure, often mandating a requirement for parties to meet and confer in good faith to resolve discovery disputes before filing a motion. However, Tristan Ellis of Shanies Law argues that courts should reconsider this conference requirement under specific circumstances. According to Ellis, when a party fails to specify a time frame by which it will complete its production, the obligation to confer could be dispensed. This argument puts forth a pragmatic approach to streamline the litigation process in scenarios where mandatory conferencing could prove inefficient.
For further insights into this topic, the article can be explored in greater detail here.