Data Brokers Challenge Constitutionality of New Jersey’s Judicial Privacy Law at Third Circuit

In a recent legal development, a group of data brokers presented their case before the Third Circuit, challenging the constitutionality of New Jersey’s judicial privacy measure, widely known as Daniel’s Law. The group contends that the law is unconstitutional on its face, arguing that a federal district judge went beyond his authority by effectively “rewriting” the legislation to uphold it. This case highlights ongoing tensions and the complexities involved in balancing privacy protections with the rights and operations of data brokerage entities. Further details on this legal challenge can be explored in the original report.