In a recent legal dispute, Light & Wonder, a prominent card shuffler manufacturer, contended that a federal judge in Illinois should dismiss a lawsuit brought by a coalition of casinos. The casinos allege that the company engaged in fraudulent activities and sham litigation to establish a monopoly. The crux of Light & Wonder’s argument is that the plaintiffs have failed to define a relevant market to support their claims. According to the company, the plaintiffs “cannot, did not and will not” provide a sufficient market definition for the case to proceed.
Details about the ongoing legal proceedings are outlined in an article by Law360, where Light & Wonder’s legal strategies and the implications for antitrust litigation are further discussed.