A federal judge in Florida has levied criticism against an attorney for heavily relying on artificial intelligence to draft legal documents containing erroneous legal citations. This criticism arose in the context of litigation involving a $5 million Canadian judgment. The judge characterized the attorney’s reliance on AI as creating a “train wreck,” which has affected multiple cases across several courts. To address the situation, the judge has mandated the submission of supplemental briefs to correct these issues.
Further details on this development can be found in the original report by Law360 at Law360.