Supreme Court Delay on Louisiana Voting Rights Case Provokes Justice Thomas’ Dissent

The U.S. Supreme Court has chosen not to settle the prolonged debate surrounding voting rights and allegations of racial gerrymandering in Louisiana. Instead, the justices have called for new arguments regarding the state’s contested congressional districts. This decision has come despite a strong objection from Justice Clarence Thomas, who expressed his dissent in no uncertain terms. Further details on the case and Thomas’ dissent can be accessed here.