Legal professionals are grappling with the ramifications of the Trump administration’s stance against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Over the past few months, these pronouncements have left attorneys questioning what is classified as “illegal DEI” and how such measures will be regulated. This ongoing uncertainty is putting companies under considerable pressure, requiring meticulous assessment…
A California man, suspected to be affiliated with an online-based terrorist group, has been charged in a scheme to solicit the murders of several public officials, according to a federal indictment unsealed Wednesday. The targets include a federal judge, a U.S. senator, and a former U.S. attorney. The group allegedly viewed these officials as impediments…
The first half of 2025 has witnessed significant developments in two major antitrust cases impacting the sports industry. The ongoing antitrust disputes between NASCAR and two of its teams have intensified, raising questions about competitive practices within the racing league. This conflict highlights the complexities that arise when regulatory frameworks intersect with competitive sports environments….
The first half of 2025 has seen significant developments in patent law. A prominent ruling by the full Federal Circuit has brought increased focus on the testimony concerning patent damages, potentially affecting how courts evaluate expert opinions in such cases. This decision underscores the heightened complexity involved in calculating patent-related financial awards. In parallel, the…
The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision, effectively blocking the enforcement of a centuries-old statute that criminalized abortion. The court’s ruling hinges on the 1849 law being effectively supplanted by subsequent legislative measures that regulate abortion more comprehensively. This decision reflects ongoing legal interpretations that balance historical statutes with contemporary legislative frameworks. More details…
Two Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives have called for an investigation by the First Circuit into the actions of a federal judge in Rhode Island. The judge in question had previously blocked a spending freeze imposed by the Trump administration. The complaint centers around the judge’s alleged conflict of interest, given a…
In an effort to intensify its fight against fraud, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have established a new working group focused on enforcement of the False Claims Act. This initiative was announced by government officials on Wednesday, signaling a concerted drive to bolster oversight and…
Disbarred attorney Tom Girardi has petitioned a California federal judge to remain at liberty on bond while appealing his wire fraud conviction. Girardi asserts that he poses neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. He has highlighted several issues on appeal that potentially could lead to a reversal or resentencing. Girardi’s legal…
In a legal battle that underscores the complexities of intellectual property rights in the biotechnology sector, Genentech Inc. has concluded a California federal trial against Biogen MA Inc., focusing on allegations of unpaid royalties amounting to $122 million. Genentech claims that Biogen has withheld these royalties for the supply of its multiple sclerosis drug. The…
In a recent legal development from the District of Delaware, a federal judge has ruled to reinstate patent claims previously deemed invalid. The case involves HQ Specialty Pharma Corp., which accused Fresenius Kabi of infringing on its injectable calcium supplement patent. The judge’s decision allows HQ Specialty to amend their patent claims, which subsequently impacted…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s recent decision to reverse the cancellation of five Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics LLC patents has led the company to withdraw its appeal in the case. This development follows the intervention of the acting director, who overturned a previous ruling that had nullified the patent claims due to alleged misconduct….
An energy infrastructure consulting firm has requested an Oregon federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a Native American nonprofit. The lawsuit accuses the firm’s founder and tribal liaison of misappropriating trade secrets. The consulting firm contends that the nonprofit has not sufficiently specified the trade secrets in question. Legal professionals interested in further…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled in a published opinion that a New York court does not have the jurisdiction to overturn an arbitral award made by a Swiss tribunal. This decision was rendered in favor of a Singaporean company involved in a joint venture for medical imaging. The arbitral…
In recent legal proceedings, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has called for Amazon to face a ‘bad faith’ finding over allegations that it mislabeled documents as privileged. This issue is part of a broader case concerning the company’s Prime subscription practices. During a session held on Wednesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., posed probing…
In a significant development, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated two conspiracy convictions connected to the FIFA bribery scandal. This ruling implicates a former 21st Century Fox executive and a media rights brokerage firm involved in major international sports tournaments. The court’s decision reverses previous actions by lower courts and clarifies that recent…
In a noteworthy development from the competitive tech landscape, Netlist Inc. has approached an Idaho federal judge with a request to dismiss a lawsuit initiated by its competitor, Micron Technology Inc. This legal action by Micron accuses Netlist of engaging in bad faith patent litigation. Netlist, however, contends that the lawsuit is merely an attempt…
In a significant legal move, California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed an amicus brief urging the California Supreme Court to reconsider a long-established state law. Bonta argues that the current prohibition on electronic recording by state trial courts in most cases severely impacts low-income litigants, effectively denying them their due process rights. This uncommon…
The judge presiding over the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust case against Deere & Co., a prominent agricultural machinery manufacturer, has taken a humorous approach in a recent court order. This move underscores the judge’s frustration with other equipment manufacturers who have been incessantly reaching out to court staff for legal guidance. The order serves as…
In a recent legal development, a federal judge in New Jersey has permitted a medical communications agency to continue with its contract and trade secret litigation against three former employees. These individuals are accused of starting a competing firm while still employed with the agency. Notably, the judge dismissed all related claims against PharmaEssentia and…
A Tennessee federal judge has imposed sanctions against a group of building manufacturing employees after determining they intentionally withheld and spoiled critical evidence during the discovery phase of litigation. The sanctions include an order for the employees to cover the attorney fees of their former employers. This decision underscores the judiciary’s stance on upholding the…
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has recently ruled in favor of Apple Inc. concerning certain claims within an authentication patent. The board determined that the claims were overly obvious, thus failing to meet the criteria required for patent protection. This decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal discourse surrounding patent claims…
Subject matter eligibility under Title 35 of the U.S. Code, Section 101, has long been a challenging area for patentees due to arbitrary and inconsistent judicial reasoning. These challenges have created complications for patent holders and applicants alike. In an opinion by Manav Das at McDonnell Boehnen, it is suggested that a shift to a…
In a recent announcement made on Truth Social, President Donald Trump has unveiled his plans to nominate two legal professionals to fill vacancies on federal appeals courts. The nominations continue to be a focal point of his judicial strategy upon returning to the White House. Trump’s selections are Eric Tung, a former federal prosecutor, for…
In an ongoing legal saga surrounding a poultry price-fixing case, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has once again mandated a reduction in attorney fees, trimming the original award from 30% of the settlement to 26.6%. This marks the second successful challenge by a class member regarding the fee structure. The decision…
In a recent legal decision, a federal judge in Illinois found that the city of Chicago discriminated against an applicant seeking a position with the fire department. The controversy centered around the applicant’s conditional job offer, which was retracted following a psychological suitability examination. The court determined that the plaintiff sufficiently demonstrated that his psychological…