The Peruvian electoral landscape has been stirred by allegations from presidential candidate Rafael Lopez Aliaga, who belongs to the ultra-conservative Renovacion Popular party. On Sunday, Lopez Aliaga claimed that fraud occurred during the April 12 general elections, pressing the Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE) to annul the results, even though he provided no substantive evidence for his claims. This assertion contrasts with both domestic and international observers, who reported no irregularities in the elections.
As it stands, with about 93 percent of ballots counted by the Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE), Keiko Fujimori leads with 17.06 percent of the votes. She is followed by Roberto Sanchez of Juntos por el Peru with 12 percent, and Lopez Aliaga trailing slightly with 11.92 percent. The narrow margin between Sanchez and Lopez Aliaga, approximately 10,000 votes, makes the battle for second place in the runoff one of the closest in Peruvian history.
Lopez Aliaga’s claims gained dramatic flair on Tuesday when he appeared at a rally outside JNE headquarters in Lima, demanding a declaration to nullify the elections within 24 hours. He warned of potential civil insurgence, alleging a scheme to place a “radical” candidate alongside Fujimori in the runoff. Despite the conviction in his rhetoric, he did not provide documentary proof or credible testimonials to support these allegations.
Escalating his campaign, Lopez Aliaga’s party posted an offer on his verified social media account, promising 20,000 soles (approximately $5,700) to anyone who could present evidence of electoral fraud, further acknowledging their lack of proof. This offer, however, was swiftly deleted.
In a letter to the JNE, Lopez Aliaga requested a suspension in the announcement of the second and third place results, citing logistical failures that purportedly prevented about 608,000 citizens in Lima from voting. However, ONPE’s data countered this, indicating only 55,261 affected voters, and asserting that 99.8 percent of polling stations functioned as expected on election day.
Various institutions have dismissed the fraud narrative. The Defensoria del Pueblo declared no basis for such allegations, while the EU Election Observation Mission endorsed the election as “peaceful,” albeit acknowledging minor logistical challenges. Meanwhile, Fujimori has urged Lopez Aliaga to cease undermining democratic processes unless he can substantiate his claims with evidence.
Under current Peruvian law, the Jurados Electorales Especiales (JEE) will deliberate over around 5,000 contested tally sheets, comprising more than five percent of the total count, before announcing the official results. Although six nullity petitions were filed, arguing that certain logistical failures breached constitutional mandates, the JNE holds final authority over any appeals. The Ley Organica de Elecciones stipulates that an election may only be annulled if irregularities demonstrably impact the final outcome, a threshold as yet unmet by the evidence presented.
More detailed information can be found here.