Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP has bolstered its appellate practice with the recruitment of four prominent litigators from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. Among the new team members are former acting Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall and Morgan L. Ratner, who have been integral in the legal efforts surrounding the appeal of former President Donald Trump’s…
The legal arena is witnessing significant developments in two notable cases. First, the talc multidistrict litigation involving Johnson & Johnson sees a shift as over a dozen attorneys, including prominent figures such as Mikal Watts and Christopher Placitella, vie to fill the leadership void left by Beasley Allen. This multidistrict litigation is undergoing a crucial…
“`html In a closely watched legal development, the Supreme Court released its opinion in the case of Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana on Friday, April 17. This verdict is anticipated to have significant impacts on environmental regulation and corporate accountability. The case drew attention due to its potential to set a precedent for…
Justice Sonia Sotomayor has issued an apology for her recent comments targeting Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in a Supreme Court decision regarding immigration stops. During a discussion at the University of Kansas Law School on April 7, Sotomayor remarked on Kavanaugh’s opinion in the case Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo. While she did not mention…
The United States Supreme Court is once again at the fore of critical legal deliberations, with attention focused on which cases it may choose to hear next term. Over on SCOTUSblog, analysis reveals several clusters of high-profile cases vying for the court’s attention. Currently, there appears to be a significant focus on Second Amendment issues….
The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF) stands out for its distinctive functions and wide-ranging powers, setting it apart from its counterparts, such as the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). A recent interview on SCOTUSblog with Professor Diego Werneck Arguelhes highlights these differences and the implications for the judiciary and politics in Brazil. The…
Recent developments in the U.S. Supreme Court have sparked particular interest within legal circles. Justice Sonia Sotomayor extended an apology to Justice Brett Kavanaugh, acknowledging tensions arising from previous interactions at the bench. This gesture is seen as an attempt to smooth over frictions that had reportedly become a distraction within the judicial deliberation process….
Supreme Court and Uninvited Government Amicus Briefs The phenomenon of the U.S. government filing “friend of the court” briefs in the Supreme Court—without being prompted—has seen an upswing recently, sparking queries from legal professionals. Traditionally, such amicus briefs are submitted at the “merits” stage, where the Court has already agreed to hear a case. However,…
Recently, retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer addressed concerns about the increasing use of the “shadow docket” by the high court. During a public statement, Breyer described the rise of these emergency orders and summary decisions as a natural development in the post-pandemic legal landscape, asserting it is not an attempt by the Supreme…
As the Supreme Court deliberates on the future of birthright citizenship in the United States, the seemingly straightforward concept of “domicile” has taken center stage, proving to be a potential fulcrum in the outcome of Trump v. Barbara. This pivotal case questions the executive order issued by former President Donald Trump, which attempts to redefine…
The recent Supreme Court case, Chiles v. Salazar, has reignited the longstanding debate over the intersection of free speech and the regulation of conversion therapy. In an 8-1 decision, the Court ruled that the Colorado law prohibiting licensed counselors from attempting to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of minors infringed on First Amendment…
The announcement of upcoming opinions on various cases brings to mind the transformative role played by Chief Justice Earl Warren in American legal history. His tenure as the 14th Chief Justice of the United States stands out due to several significant rulings that have left an indelible mark on the legal landscape. Warren’s judicial legacy…
As the Supreme Court prepares for arguments in the case Blanche v. Lau this week, the legal community is closely watching how the court will interpret the rights of lawful permanent residents accused of criminal activity in the United States. At the heart of the case is Muk Choi Lau, a Chinese national and a…
The Supreme Court has remanded a significant case to the federal courts, concerning a lawsuit that seeks to hold oil and gas companies accountable for environmental damage along the Louisiana coast. This case, brought forth by several Louisiana parishes, emerged after complaints were filed more than a decade ago in state court, arguing that these…
A recent legal battle highlights significant concerns over workplace discrimination and retaliation, as a lawsuit filed by a former director for associate recruiting at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP alleges unlawful termination due to her pregnancy. The former employee, a Black woman, disclosed her high-risk pregnancy to her supervisor and was purportedly dismissed from her…
The Supreme Court’s decision to halt President Obama’s Clean Power Plan in February 2016 marked a significant moment on its emergency docket. As detailed by Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak in The New York Times, this was the first time such a substantial executive regulatory action was stopped before any appellate court ruling. The leak…
The United States Supreme Court has made headlines once again by agreeing to hear a case involving religious liberty and LGBTQ rights, a legal issue that continues to engage large sectors of American society. The case in question, St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, was accepted for review by the Court on Monday morning, and…
Last week, Justice Clarence Thomas addressed an audience at the University of Texas at Austin, commemorating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. His remarks focused on the role of the court, government, and the necessity of courage to adhere to what he considers the founders’ ideals. Learn more about the event and the…
FCC Jury Trial The U.S. Supreme Court recently deliberated over a significant case challenging the constitutionality of fines imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on major telecommunications carriers, AT&T and Verizon, for breaching federal communications laws. Central to the case, FCC v. AT&T, is the assertion by these corporations that their Seventh Amendment right…
Anthropic PBC is defending its use of copyrighted music material to enhance its artificial intelligence model, Claude. The company has argued in a California federal court that its application of copyrighted works should be considered “transformative” and, therefore, fair use under existing copyright law. The case sheds light on the ongoing legal battles involving AI…
The Supreme Court justices have recently contemplated the complex relationship between state and federal courts, specifically focusing on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, during oral arguments in T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System. This doctrine restricts lower federal courts from reviewing cases where state-court judgments have already been entered, preventing federal intervention in state court decisions….
In a recent speech at the University of Texas, Justice Clarence Thomas launched a scathing critique of progressivism, identifying it as the root of many societal ills since the 20th century. At an event commemorating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas attempted to link progressivism with historical figures such as Stalin, Hitler,…
In a recent Supreme Court session, justices deliberated on a case critical to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) authority to wield “disgorgement” as a remedial measure. The case in question, Sripetch v SEC, examines whether the SEC can compel a wrongdoer to surrender profits sans evidence of harm to consumers. Ongkaruck Sripetch, who pleaded…
The Supreme Court has announced the addition of two cases to its docket for the 2026-27 term. This decision comes at a time when attention is increasingly focused on the personal and professional pressures faced by members of the judiciary, raising questions about their mental health and the resources available to them. The legal community…
SCOTUSblog has unveiled a comprehensive redesign, marking a significant shift in both aesthetics and functionality, a little over a year after its acquisition by The Dispatch. The redesign initiative aligns with the commitment made at the time of acquisition to enhance the blog’s rigorous reporting and analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court, aiming to make…