In a recent development in the legal battle over the “Crave” book series, a New York federal judge has expressed frustration with the handling of the case. During proceedings on September 23, 2026, the judge reprimanded the attorney representing the writer in a copyright infringement lawsuit that was ultimately unsuccessful. The judge insisted that the plaintiff address all questions during a deposition concerning attorney fees. The judge reportedly described feeling “tired of this” and criticized the plaintiff’s legal team for “being jerked around” throughout the case.
The case in question involved claims that the popular “Crave” series had infringed upon the copyrights of another writer. However, the crux of the legal debate now seems to center on the attorney fees incurred, and the judge’s comments highlight increasing impatience with the progress and conduct of the proceedings. The judge’s admonishment suggests that the legal team may not have been forthcoming or efficient in their handling of the case, as detailed in a report by Law360.
This case adds another layer to the ongoing conversation about the complexities of copyright law within the rapidly evolving publishing world. In similar cases, judges have often emphasized the importance of clarity and cooperation during legal proceedings to avoid unnecessary delays and expenses, an issue brought to the forefront in this situation. The outcome of this case, particularly as it pertains to the determination of attorney fees, could have broader implications for future copyright disputes in the literary world, especially in the “romantasy” genre that combines elements of romance and fantasy.
As the legal community observes these developments, it serves as a reminder of the critical role of transparency and responsiveness in legal practice. With continued scrutiny, it remains to be seen how this case will ultimately influence both legal strategies and the broader publishing industry.