As the U.S. Supreme Court commences a new term, legal professionals are closely monitoring several significant circuit splits that may soon command the Court’s attention. In recent years, the Supreme Court has been addressing fewer cases, with its docket hitting a historical low last term. A key contributor to this trend is the Court’s diminishing focus on resolving circuit splits, a factor that legal experts find consequential.
This term, five circuit splits are drawing considerable attention. Each has the potential to offer the Supreme Court an opportunity to clarify legal uncertainties affecting multiple jurisdictions.
-
Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Courts are divided on whether arbitration agreements enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) can be challenged for unconscionability. The Ninth Circuit has taken a more consumer-friendly approach, allowing challenges, whereas the Fifth Circuit takes a more stringent stance favoring enforceability. This discrepancy has fueled calls for Supreme Court clarification.
-
The Scope of Title VII Protections: There’s inconsistency regarding the extent of Title VII’s protections against workplace discrimination. Specifically, whether this extends to encompass protection against sexual orientation discrimination remains unsettled. While some circuits, like the Seventh, have recognized these protections, others have resisted, creating a patchwork of legal standards across the nation.
-
Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Cases: Divergence also exists in the interpretation and application of qualified immunity for law enforcement and public officials. Certain circuits have adopted more restrictive views, limiting when officials can claim immunity from lawsuits, whereas other circuits offer broader protections. Uniformity in this area is eagerly awaited due to its impact on civil rights litigation.
-
Environmental Regulations under the Clean Water Act: Courts are split on the jurisdictional reach of the Clean Water Act, particularly concerning the definition of “waters of the United States.” The Supreme Court previously sought to resolve this in Sackett v. EPA, but questions remain, suggesting the possibility of further review.
-
The First Sale Doctrine and Digital Goods: Finally, confusion persists regarding the application of the First Sale Doctrine to digital goods. While the traditional doctrine applies to physical goods, courts are divided over its applicability in cases involving digital products and services, raising consequential questions for copyright law in the digital age.
Legal analysts and practitioners agree that resolving these splits could have a profound impact on multiple facets of law and policy. However, as reported by Law360, the Court’s reluctance to engage with circuit splits continues to influence its docket size and the broader judiciary landscape.