The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has given Apple the green light to import its redesigned Apple Watch, as it no longer infringes patents held by Masimo Corp. This decision marks the conclusion of a protracted legal battle that began when an import ban was imposed on certain Apple Watch models in 2023 due to…
The panel selection for a key appeals case involving major law firms highlights a notable convergence of judicial appointments from different administrations. Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan, appointed by President Obama, along with Judge Cornelia Pillard, another Obama appointee, and Judge Neomi Rao, appointed by President Trump, will preside over the hearing of combined appeals cases…
In a notable development, a coalition of former U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) officials has voiced support for four prominent law firms in their legal battle against an appeal by the Trump administration. This appeal seeks to reinstate a series of executive orders targeting these firms. The former EEOC leaders contend that these directives…
“`html The balance between jury trials and administrative adjudication has been center stage as the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the enforcement methodologies of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The case of George Jarkesy, documented on SCOTUSblog, offers a critical examination of administrative tribunals versus the traditional jury structure, raising significant questions about the Seventh…
The U.S. Supreme Court has recently curtailed job protections for administrative law judges (ALJs), potentially increasing executive power—a move largely seen as advantageous to the former Trump administration’s policies. The decision hinges on a dispute involving ALJ oversight and appointment processes, amplifying presidential control over federal agency litigation outcomes. Legal experts view this development as…
The Supreme Court recently announced its intention to hear arguments on the Trump administration’s initiative to rescind Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from Syrian and Haitian nationals. This decision is poised to impact not only these two cases but also several ongoing lawsuits challenging the administration’s revisions to the TPS program, a mechanism allowing eligible non-citizens…
Intuit’s recent victory in court marks a significant moment in its ongoing battle with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over allegedly deceptive advertising practices. The case stems from a 2024 ruling by the FTC under then-Chair Lina Khan, which ordered Intuit to cease its claims that TurboTax was “free” without providing clearer disclaimers. The administrative…
A legal skirmish over the status of Syrian nationals in the United States has reached the country’s highest court as a group of these individuals have petitioned the Supreme Court to uphold a lower court ruling that allows them to remain. This stems from a decision made in November 2025, when U.S. District Judge Katherine…
The U.S. Department of Justice has moved to dismiss a lawsuit filed by an erstwhile DOJ official who claimed wrongful termination after being covertly recorded discussing Jeffrey Epstein, believing he was on a date. The DOJ filed a motion with a federal court in D.C., asserting that the district courts lack jurisdiction and that the…
Recent discussions in the legal community highlight concerns regarding the composition of federal agencies, particularly when they operate without a full complement of board members. Lawyers specializing in administrative law are being urged to scrutinize these potentially inquorate agencies as grounds for litigation. The prompt for such scrutiny comes from increased incidences where agencies have…
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has reactivated patent infringement claims against a Chinese importer of fluoride resin products, overturning a prior ruling by an administrative law judge. The ruling concerns allegations by Syensqo, a chemical company, which argues that the Chinese firm is infringing on its patents by importing resin products into the United…
Epstein Becker Green (EBG) has announced the addition of Charlotte Luckstone, who previously served as Acting General Counsel for the U.S. Marshals Service, to their legal team. This strategic hire underscores EBG’s commitment to enhancing its capabilities in government and regulatory affairs. During her tenure at the U.S. Marshals Service, Luckstone was responsible for overseeing…
As the U.S. Supreme Court continues to issue decisions that resonate on a national scale, the role of academic briefs in shaping these rulings becomes increasingly apparent. A recent analysis highlights this growing influence, punctuated by the landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In this case, the Court’s decision to overturn the…
Squire Patton Boggs has made strategic moves to bolster its Washington, D.C. office by hiring two high-profile partners from competing firms. This decision underscores the firm’s commitment to enhancing its presence in the capital and tapping into seasoned expertise. The firm has welcomed Attorney Evan Pritchard from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP and Attorney Paige…
Sharon Goodie, serving as an administrative law judge in Washington, D.C., has been renominated by President Donald Trump to become an associate judge on the Superior Court for the District of Columbia. Her renomination underscores a continued effort to shape the judicial landscape within the capital, a move that could have implications for the court’s…
In a significant development for U.S. trade enforcement, the International Trade Commission (ITC) has chosen not to review penalties imposed on four grocery chains for breaching a ban against importing chocolate malt drink mix. The administrative law judge’s ruling penalizes these retailers for flouting trade restrictions, reflecting an ongoing commitment to uphold regulatory measures. The…
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has initiated an investigation into whether imports of certain processed slabs infringe upon patents held by Cambria Company LLC, a Minnesota-based quartz surface manufacturer. This action follows a complaint filed by Cambria on December 19, 2025, alleging violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 due to…
In 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued several decisions that underscored the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) broad discretion in managing inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, highlighting ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the patent office. In November 2025, the Federal Circuit denied Motorola Solutions’ petition for mandamus…
The shifting landscape of universal injunctions continues to be a focal point for appellate lawyers following a recent nationwide rebuff. The ongoing discourse centers around lower court decisions regarding the availability of universal injunctions under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). These legal tools have been instrumental in blocking policies with national implications, raising significant interest…
The United States Supreme Court recently demonstrated hesitancy in addressing the legal complexities surrounding former President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Mark Cook, a federal employee. The justices during oral arguments appeared to toy with the prospect of sidestepping the underlying constitutional matters, potentially opting to send the case back to a lower court for…
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a decision permitting the Trump administration’s reductions in climate-related grants to proceed. This ruling comes following claims by the Sustainability Institute and other nonprofits that these grant terminations were in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court, however, determined that these claims were essentially contractual in…
In a notable shift from previous political alignments, former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement is representing Federal Reserve Governor Philip Jefferson and others in a high-stakes Supreme Court case, diverging from the Trump administration’s stance. This case focuses on the autonomy of the Federal Reserve’s structure, challenging past assertions and emphasizing central banking independence. Clement’s…
The case of Trump v. Cook, which centers on President Donald Trump’s attempt to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, presents intriguing questions for both the legal and business communities. The implications extend far beyond typical court-watchers due to its potential impact on global markets and the interpretation of American administrative law. For those looking…
The U.S. Supreme Court has recently been active on several high-profile matters, as highlighted here. This past Wednesday, the court released decisions in three argued cases: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, Case v. Montana, and Barrett v. United States. In Bost, the court affirmed that Congressman Michael Bost has the standing to challenge…
The legal community is closely watching as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares for oral arguments in the case of Trump v. Cook, scheduled for Wednesday, January 21. The case, which concerns President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, promises to offer significant insights into…