Squire Patton Boggs has made strategic moves to bolster its Washington, D.C. office by hiring two high-profile partners from competing firms. This decision underscores the firm’s commitment to enhancing its presence in the capital and tapping into seasoned expertise. The firm has welcomed Attorney Evan Pritchard from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP and Attorney Paige…
Sharon Goodie, serving as an administrative law judge in Washington, D.C., has been renominated by President Donald Trump to become an associate judge on the Superior Court for the District of Columbia. Her renomination underscores a continued effort to shape the judicial landscape within the capital, a move that could have implications for the court’s…
In a significant development for U.S. trade enforcement, the International Trade Commission (ITC) has chosen not to review penalties imposed on four grocery chains for breaching a ban against importing chocolate malt drink mix. The administrative law judge’s ruling penalizes these retailers for flouting trade restrictions, reflecting an ongoing commitment to uphold regulatory measures. The…
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has initiated an investigation into whether imports of certain processed slabs infringe upon patents held by Cambria Company LLC, a Minnesota-based quartz surface manufacturer. This action follows a complaint filed by Cambria on December 19, 2025, alleging violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 due to…
In 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued several decisions that underscored the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) broad discretion in managing inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, highlighting ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the patent office. In November 2025, the Federal Circuit denied Motorola Solutions’ petition for mandamus…
The shifting landscape of universal injunctions continues to be a focal point for appellate lawyers following a recent nationwide rebuff. The ongoing discourse centers around lower court decisions regarding the availability of universal injunctions under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). These legal tools have been instrumental in blocking policies with national implications, raising significant interest…
The United States Supreme Court recently demonstrated hesitancy in addressing the legal complexities surrounding former President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Mark Cook, a federal employee. The justices during oral arguments appeared to toy with the prospect of sidestepping the underlying constitutional matters, potentially opting to send the case back to a lower court for…
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a decision permitting the Trump administration’s reductions in climate-related grants to proceed. This ruling comes following claims by the Sustainability Institute and other nonprofits that these grant terminations were in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court, however, determined that these claims were essentially contractual in…
In a notable shift from previous political alignments, former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement is representing Federal Reserve Governor Philip Jefferson and others in a high-stakes Supreme Court case, diverging from the Trump administration’s stance. This case focuses on the autonomy of the Federal Reserve’s structure, challenging past assertions and emphasizing central banking independence. Clement’s…
The case of Trump v. Cook, which centers on President Donald Trump’s attempt to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, presents intriguing questions for both the legal and business communities. The implications extend far beyond typical court-watchers due to its potential impact on global markets and the interpretation of American administrative law. For those looking…
The U.S. Supreme Court has recently been active on several high-profile matters, as highlighted here. This past Wednesday, the court released decisions in three argued cases: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, Case v. Montana, and Barrett v. United States. In Bost, the court affirmed that Congressman Michael Bost has the standing to challenge…
The legal community is closely watching as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares for oral arguments in the case of Trump v. Cook, scheduled for Wednesday, January 21. The case, which concerns President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, promises to offer significant insights into…
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to delve into a legal question with significant implications for telecommunications companies. At the heart of the issue is whether the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is empowered to utilize its internal enforcement processes to impose fines exceeding $100 million on industry giants Verizon and AT&T for allegedly mishandling customer…
In a significant legal maneuver, NJOY LLC and Altria Group Inc. have petitioned a Virginia federal judge to rule in their favor concerning a lawsuit initiated against the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The suit challenges the appointment of an administrative law judge (ALJ) tasked with overseeing proceedings that aim to restrict the importation of…
The U.S. Department of Justice has expressed intent to appeal a federal judge’s decision to reinstate the security clearance of attorney Mark Zaid. This comes after a D.C. Circuit court ordered the reinstatement following the clearance’s revocation, a move that has drawn significant attention across legal and political circles. While the DOJ has agreed to…
The National Judicial College (NJC) has appointed Aviva Abramovsky, the current dean of the University of Idaho College of Law, as its next president and chief executive officer. This appointment marks the first time a woman will lead the NJC since its establishment in 1963. Dean Abramovsky brings a wealth of experience in legal education…
Aviva Abramovsky, the Dean of the University of Idaho College of Law, has been appointed as the first woman president of the National Judicial College (NJC). This historic appointment marks a significant milestone for the NJC, which has been instrumental in providing education and training to judges across the United States since its founding in…
Federal immigration officials have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn an appellate ruling that allowed immigration judges to challenge a newly implemented speech policy in district court. The legal contention centers around whether disputes involving immigration judges should be addressed within the specialized review system designated by Congress, rather than the federal court system…
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into legal practice is reshaping administrative law, particularly in the drafting of legal documents. AI tools are streamlining processes, enhancing accuracy, and allowing legal professionals to focus on more complex aspects of their work. One notable example is Ohio’s initiative to simplify its state administrative code. By employing AI,…
The legal world is abuzz with discussions surrounding the potential implications of the Supreme Court’s intervention in clarifying the Loper Bright doctrine through the lens of a patent case. As legal professionals are keenly aware, the Loper Bright doctrine is a pivotal factor in understanding the scope of Chevron deference, a principle that significantly impacts…
Recent developments in a lawsuit challenging the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have reignited debates on the boundaries of congressional delegation to administrative agencies. The case, focusing on workplace safety regulation, may redefine how far Congress can delegate regulatory power to bodies like OSHA, a topic that has long been contentious in administrative law….
The ratification of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791, marks a notable moment in U.S. history and remains a relevant constitutional cornerstone as the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) prepares to release its order list today. The order list, expected at 9:30 a.m. EST, concludes the justices’ final regularly scheduled private…
The landscape of relator suits has experienced notable shifts as new constitutional challenges gain traction. Legal professionals are closely monitoring these developments to assess their potential impacts on the frameworks that govern False Claims Act (FCA) cases. Recent judicial interpretations suggest a renewed openness to questioning the foundation of qui tam actions, which traditionally allow…
The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority recently scrutinized the longstanding precedent that restricts the removal of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) members only for cause. This scrutiny was described as probing the “dried husk” of firing protections, raising questions about the limits of such safeguards for members of independent agencies. During the oral arguments, some justices…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has issued a significant ruling regarding presidential powers, deciding 2-1 that constraints on the president’s authority to dismiss members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not apply. This decision hinges on the interpretation of Humphrey’s…