The ongoing Supreme Court case, FCC v. Consumers’ Research, places broadband internet and the Universal Service Fund (USF) under scrutiny. Historically implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the USF aims to make telecommunications access affordable, particularly in rural and low-income areas. The challengers in this case argue that Congress has improperly delegated legislative authority…
The Supreme Court has paused an order requiring the federal government to reinstate over 16,000 federal employees dismissed earlier this year from six agencies. The decision follows a challenge by a group of nonprofits, alleging that the terminations violated federal administrative laws. In a 7-2 vote, the justices have put on hold the directive from…
“`html The Supreme Court docket continues to captivate the legal community with its array of impactful cases, and SCOTUSblog’s Wednesday morning read provides a brief but compelling glimpse into the most significant developments. A pivotal decision on Wednesday centers on the Court’s decision to block an order that would have required the Trump administration to…
In recent weeks, several lawsuits have been initiated by foreign students who assert that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has overstepped its bounds by unlawfully terminating their F-1 visa status. The litigation challenges the federal government’s authority, specifically targeting what plaintiffs argue are violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and due process rights….
DLA Piper, a prominent global law firm, has announced the addition of Tomás Correa as a partner in its Chilean office, specifically within the public law and regulated markets practice. This strategic move reinforces the firm’s commitment to enhancing its capabilities in key practice areas, especially as they relate to administrative law. Correa’s practice brings…
The U.S. Supreme Court this week issued a temporary reprieve for the federal government, pausing an order from a San Francisco judge mandating the reinstatement of over 16,000 federal employees dismissed by several agencies. This decision, made by an apparent 7-2 vote, represents a critical juncture in the ongoing legal dispute between the federal administration…
The United States Supreme Court has provided further clarification on the judicial approach regarding policy reversals by administrative agencies when there is a change in the presidential administration. This development follows the court’s recent decision in a case involving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and their rejection of applications to market flavored vaping products….
The United States Supreme Court has authorized the halting of over $65 million in teacher training grants, following a request from the Trump administration. This move follows a decision by a federal judge in Massachusetts essentially requiring the Department of Education to restore the said funds. The grants in question were withdrawn in February after…
A coalition of nonprofits has called on the Supreme Court to uphold a decision by a federal judge in San Francisco mandating the federal government to reinstate over 16,000 probationary employees dismissed by six agencies in February. The group argues that there is no substantial harm in returning the employees to their positions, noting that…
The Supreme Court has largely affirmed the Food and Drug Administration’s rejection of two companies’ bids to sell flavored vaping liquids. In a unanimous decision, the court overturned a judgment by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which had previously claimed that the FDA performed a “regulatory switcheroo.” The appeals court argued…
The legal battle over the Trump administration’s decision to cancel over $65 million in teacher training grants has now reached the Supreme Court, with Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris making an appeal to halt a federal judge’s order mandating the reinstatement of these funds. The grants, initially terminated by the Department of Education in February…
The U.S. Supreme Court recently made waves by overruling the longstanding Chevron deference doctrine, a move that opens a new frontier in challenging agency authority. In its current term, the court is weighing a question that could have similarly significant implications: How much latitude can Congress grant an agency without running afoul of the non-delegation…
McCarter & English has announced the recruitment of Erin Prest as a partner in its cybersecurity team based in Washington. Prest brings experience from her role as deputy general counsel for the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s investigative and administrative law branch. Her move is poised to strengthen McCarter’s capabilities in handling cybersecurity, data privacy, and…
Trent McCotter, a partner at Boyden Gray, is set to make his long-awaited debut at the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26 in a case that has gained considerable attention within legal circles. After nearly eight years since his previous opportunity to present before the court, McCotter is slated to argue in FCC v. Consumers’…
President Donald Trump, in a bold judicial strategy, appears ready to engage in protracted legal battles as he continues to challenge courts over administrative decisions and policies. This development comes amid a series of legal setbacks for his administration. The president’s mounting judicial conflicts underscore his determination to restructure key government frameworks and policies. These…
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to deliberate on two significant cases. As the justices return to the bench on Monday, they will hear arguments regarding the potential revival of the non-delegation doctrine, a separation of powers principle that has largely been inactive. This case could lead to a substantial shift in regulatory power, reverberating…
The Supreme Court is poised to address a significant legal quandary at the end of March: the extent to which Congress can delegate its rulemaking power to federal agencies. The case has the potential to redefine legislative power by revisiting the nondelegation doctrine, a cornerstone of administrative law. This legal principle originally mandates that Congress…
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has handed down a decision that could significantly alter the landscape of inmate disciplinary proceedings across the nation. In a ruling released last Friday, the court established that the standard of proof required in major disciplinary offence proceedings for inmates must be elevated from the “balance of probabilities” to…
A coalition of Democratic-led states has taken legal action against the Trump administration, filing a complaint in response to extensive layoffs within the Education Department. These states argue that the reduction in force amounts to an unconstitutional dismantling of an agency created by Congress. The complaint was filed by the Attorneys General of states including…
In light of recent developments, the interpretation of binding circuit precedent post-Chevron is under scrutiny in the legal community. Dan Jarcho, a partner at Alston & Bird known for his work in administrative law, has pointed out inconsistencies in a decision by the Sixth Circuit. According to Jarcho, the decision reflects an attempt to address…
In an intriguing dialogue with Bloomberg Law, California Attorney General Rob Bonta shed light on his legal strategy in response to President Donald Trump’s administration, indicating that his team is poised and ready for another round of disputes. During the interview, Bonta revealed how his previous experiences with Trump’s first term equipped him to expect…
Fisher Phillips has announced the addition of Geoffrey Forney as a litigation partner based in Portland, Maine. His practice will primarily revolve around employee benefits litigation falling under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and administrative law litigation under the Immigration and Nationality Act. To learn more about his specific role, you can view…
The recent actions by the Trump administration have drawn sharp criticism from international quarters, especially from UN human rights expert Margaret Satterthwaite. On Friday, Satterthwaite publicly condemned the substantial purges within the US Department of Justice. These removals have notably targeted officials involved in the criminal investigations of President Donald Trump, as well as those…
The United States Supreme Court has declined to entertain a request from the Trump administration to halt a lower court’s directive ordering the payment of approximately $2 billion in foreign aid reimbursements. This decision comes in light of an ongoing dispute concerning foreign-aid funding among various governmental agencies and contractors. The [case details](https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/03/supreme-court-denies-trump-request-to-block-2-billion-foreign-aid-payment/) reflect deeply…
In the world of administrative law, few doctrines have had as significant an impact as the Chevron Doctrine, stemming from the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. This landmark decision fundamentally altered how federal agencies interpret congressional statutes, setting a precedent that would guide regulatory practices for decades….