Michigan Court Overturns Protective Order, Upholds Free Speech in Public Policy Debate

A Michigan state appeals court recently overturned a protective order issued by the city attorney of Inkster against a man accused of stalking and harassing him. Although the court acknowledged the man’s behavior as “distasteful,” it still ruled in favor of the defendant, stating that the man’s actions fell under the scope of constitutionally protected…

Read More

Pennsylvania Court Rules Welfare Fraud History Not Grounds for Housing Assistance Denial

In a recent decision, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court ruling clarifying that a history of welfare fraud and outstanding restitution cannot justify a denial of housing assistance. This marked a victory for applicants seeking support through Pennsylvania’s housing voucher programs. The case at the center of the ruling involved the Lawrence…

Read More

COVID-19 Claims Dismissed: Court Supports Qualified Immunity for State-Funded Healthcare Facility

On October 25, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit validated the dismissal of a lawsuit brought forward by a certified nursing assistant against a state-funded healthcare facility. Citing the principle of qualified immunity, the court confirmed that the defendant facility, which houses veterans, was entitled to this defense. According to the full…

Read More

Fifth Circuit Court Clarifies “Advertising Idea” Term in Commercial Liability Policies

In a recent ruling, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals worked to clarify the interpretation of the phrase “advertising idea” in the insuring agreement of a commercial general liability policy’s “personal and advertising injury” coverage section. This ruling came about through the case of Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. A.H.D. Houston Inc….

Read More

Court Ruling Clarifies Distinct Liability Boundaries in Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Cases

Last month, a noteworthy decision came from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Munoz v. Intercontinental Terminals Company. This case aimed to resolve a long-standing legal grey area involving the intersection of oil pollution and hazardous substances. For a long time, it wasn’t clear if the liability provisions of the Comprehensive…

Read More

Court Decision Clarifies OPA and CERCLA Jurisdiction in Mixed Oil and Hazardous Substance Releases

In a significant interpretation of US environmental law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“5th Circuit”) has delivered an October 27th Opinion addressing an issue arising out of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Lability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”). For background, OPA and CERCLA…

Read More

Republican AGs Challenge Department of Labor Rule on ESG Considerations in Retirement Plan Investments

In a recent development, a coalition of 25 Republican Attorneys General (AGs) have decided to appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit against the implementation of a Department of Labor rule. This regulation, in its essence, authorises retirement plan fiduciaries to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when designating plan…

Read More

Ohio Supreme Court Ruling Looms Over Insurers and Manufacturers in $409M Lead Paint Liability Case

The Ohio Supreme Court is currently considering whether insurers are obliged to indemnify Sherwin-Williams Co., the paint manufacturer which, along with others, was found liable in a $409 million public nuisance case over lead paint. Lawyers on both sides have expressed concerns over the potential wider implications of the forthcoming decision. Earlier this week, the…

Read More

Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal Over Mask Mandate Ridicule, Bolstering Employers’ Safety Responsibilities

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect workplaces around the globe, a recent case has demonstrated that employers may dismiss employees if their behaviour undermines measures implemented for public health safety. In this instance, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a manager who made disparaging remarks about his employer’s mask mandate….

Read More