In a continuing commitment to the deeper understanding of complex legal requirements in the education sector, Bricker Graydon’s Higher Education Team is joining hands with Allegheny College for a two-day Title IX Training. The program, scheduled for November 10th in Meadville, PA, bills to augment participants’ skill sets by providing comprehensive training on Title IX…
Bricker Graydon’s Higher Education Team has announced a partnership with Allegheny College to host a two-day Title IX Training event from November 3rd. The training program, which is accessible both in-person and online, is designed to answer the increasing demand for expertise in Title IX proceedings. Title IX, a federal law passed as part of…
Frank Jackson, a previous trial and national tax shelter project lawyer for the IRS, has been announced as a new partner with the reputable tax practice group at McDermott Will & Emery, based in New York. This news was originally published on Bloomberg Tax Automation. Throughout his noteworthy career, Jackson has brought unmatched expertise to…
On 3 October 2023, a case that could redefine the financial landscape was brought before the Supreme Court. The case in question: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association, Ltd., No. 22-448. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a U.S. government agency tasked with consumer protection in the financial sector, challenged the decision…
A state-led Republican challenge to the US Labor Department’s “ESG Rule,” governing retirement investing with respect to environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG), is now under consideration by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Over two dozen Republican state attorneys general lodged a suit against the department, appealing against the regulation of…
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) reversal of Trump-era restrictions around companies directing shareholder voting has encountered mixed reactions at the Sixth Circuit. While some support the rollback, others have voiced skepticism, aligning themselves with the concerns voiced by another conservative-leaning federal appeals tribunal. The 2022 regulatory rollback imposed by the SEC drew criticism…
In a recent show of appreciation from Above The Law, the legal news website expressed its gratitude towards its advertisers, fostering a cooperative and supportive environment for both parties involved. This sentiment not only underlines the mutual respect and regard the news outlet has for its sponsors but also the vital role they play in…
In a recent Oregon Court of Appeals case (“The Final Table, LLC v. Acceptance Casualty Insurance Co.”), a new perspective focused on the vital importance and intricacy of the details within insurance contracts has emerged. The case serves as a fascinating and cautionary illustration for insurance policyholders and legal professionals navigating such contracts. In this…
Kimberly Moore and fellow jurists from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals continue their determined efforts to oust Judge Pauline Newman, the oldest sitting judge in the nation. Despite a hefty caseload of patent litigation and veterans benefits issues, they are focused on preventing Newman from presiding over—and likely dissenting from—their cases. Bloomberg Law reports that…
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently made a crucial judgement in the case Finjan LLC v. SonicWall, Inc., Case No. 22-1048. The ruling established that claim interpretation, which naturally arises from the parties’ stipulated claim construction, is binding on the parties regardless of whether the interpretation reads preferred embodiments out of…
In a recent legal ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a district court’s claim construction and jury instructions, but notably reversed a premature judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on the grounds of obviousness and due to an imprecise damages award. This was the case of Cyntec Company, Ltd….
In a noteworthy ruling, a split panel decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overturned the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, declaring that fraud after registration is not a legitimate basis for canceling an otherwise incontestable registered mark. The case in question is Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc., Case…
In a significant development, the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld the decision to quash the decision of the Alberta Minister of Energy under Alberta’s oil sands royalty regime (OSR Regime). The case, Shell Canada Limited v. Alberta (Energy), marks the initial appellate-level interpretation of the OSR Regime. Fundamentally, the court’s decision demonstrates the willingness…
A recent ruling by the Texas Court of Appeals has delivered new insights concerning the accrual of the statute of limitations for property and casualty insurance claims. Seemingly counter to the expectations of many, the decree found no requirement for an insurer to utter “magic words” to begin the statute of limitations period. Rather, it’s…
In a recent groundbreaking development, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of Eisenhauer v. Culinary Institute of America, No. 21-2919-CV, has dictated that employers are not required to indicate that a “factor other than sex” defense is job-related according to the federal Equal Pay Act (EPA). This ruling presents…
In a move that serves as a refreshing reminder of the importance of terminology in legal proceedings, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently overruled a claim construction that was instituted during an inter partes review (IPR). The ruling was made under the grounds that the Patent Trial & Appeal Board had…
Diet supplement manufacturer Elysium Health Inc. was unable to avoid a $2.5 million settlement with Chromadex Inc. despite winning a summary judgment. This surprising turn of events came about after an email confirmation of the settlement deal was enforced, in spite of a district court passing judgment without knowledge of this agreement. The affirmation of…
Judge Pauline Newman, at 96, is making a compelling argument for her reinstatement after her suspension from the Federal Circuit. This situation is unique since her fellow judges sidelined her due to non-compliance with a fitness probe. No stranger to resistance, she now faces one of her most challenging legal battles yet – reinstitution. Driven…
A recent Ninth Circuit court decision could have significant implications for investors engaging in initial stages of securities class actions, illuminating the importance of continued involvement if they plan to challenge unfavorable judgments. In the heart of the case was an iRhythm Technologies Inc. shareholder, Mark Habelt who found himself entangled in a peculiar situation….
The recent decision made by the Michigan Court of Appeals in Bronson Health Care v. Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company has significant implications for both pending claims in Michigan and how insurance carrier underwriting departments should manage policy renewals. Central to the case was evidentiary support confirming an insured party’s electronic signature (e-signature). This…
The New York Court of Appeals ruled that the state legislature authorized the Commission on Forensic Sciences to create rules that allow police to access the New York state DNA database for identifying relatives of potential suspects. This decision effectively enables New York police to continue using the state’s DNA databank for such searches. The…
The Nasdaq’s board diversity rules, which aim to enhance the presence of women and minorities on the boards of its listed companies, have fallen under appeal by a conservative group. On Wednesday, the Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment initiated an appeal against a resolution by a panel of judges on the Fifth Circuit. The decision…
On October 25, 2023, the Supreme Court declined a request by two Florida-based casinos to halt a prior decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that permitted a Native American tribe to accept online sports bets. This request was part of a larger effort by the casinos to secure…
Former British citizen Shamima Begum has initiated another appeal with an aspiration of regaining her British citizenship after the prior appeal was overruled in February. This development comes as a consequence of involvement with the ISIS terrorist organization in Syria. In 2015, the then 15-year-old left the United Kingdom and allied with ISIS, subsequently marrying…
In an important development, the Massachusetts Appeals Court has upheld a superior court decision stating that Tufts Medical Center had discriminated against one of its nurses on the grounds of her disability. The case in question is related to the medical center’s failure to offer nurse Marie Lunie Dalexis a reasonable provision for her inability…