Court-Ordered Relief Reduces No Surprises Act IDR Administrative Fee to $50: Impact on Providers

In a recent development concerning the Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process under the No Surprises Act, providers have finally obtained court ordered relief to the $350 administrative fee each party was required to pay. The order came after significant backlash over the perceived excessive fee structure, calling its affordability into question. Until new administrative…

Read More

Yulchon Bolsters Dispute Resolution and Antitrust Practices with Strategic Partner Hires

Big Six South Korean firm, Yulchon, is turning heads in the legal industry with recent partner hires designed to bolster both their dispute resolution practice and antitrust practice. The company confirmed in an announcement with Law.com International, that they have drawn new hires from both the Korea Fair Trade Commission and international dispute resolution law…

Read More

Geopolitical Climate Shifts Reflected in LCIA’s 2022 Commercial Arbitration Trends

As observed over the years, the statistical trends in commercial arbitration practice, a primary method for settling private disputes, have consistently reflected significant geopolitical occurrences. The latest stats brought forth by the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) in its 2022 annual report uphold this phenomenon. Despite it seemingly being “business as usual” for the…

Read More

AutoNation Faces Legal Repercussions: E-Signature Protocols Bring Discrimination Case to Forefront

In a recent employee discrimination case, AutoNation’s protocol for utilizing electronic signatures on employment documents came under fire. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals determined that insufficient practices were in place, warranting an evidentiary hearing. The ruling demands a reassessment of how the company now needs to determine if their employee purposefully signed an arbitration agreement….

Read More

Former Rouse Disputes Head Douglas Clark Joins Tanner De Witt to Strengthen Intellectual Property and Arbitration Practices

Douglas Clark, the former head of global disputes practice at U.K. intellectual property firm Rouse, is slated to join Hong Kong’s independent law firm Tanner De Witt. Come September 1, he is set to commence his role as a partner, with plans to build its intellectual property practice whilst assisting in the expansion of its…

Read More

Legal Tech Expert Steve Errick Joins AAA as Senior VP Focusing on AI and Tech in Dispute Resolution

Legal tech and publishing veteran Steve Errick, previously the chief operating officer at Fastcase and head of the Legal Research Information Division at LexisNexis, has recently taken up a new role with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) as senior vice president and chief development officer. In his new role, Errick will guide various strategic initiatives,…

Read More

Axiom Ince Partner Appeals SRA Suspension in High Court Battle

In a compelling development, the recently suspended partner of Axiom Ince has taken his appeal to the High Court against what his counsel referred to as a ‘draconian’ decision by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). The senior partner’s lawyer mentioned that his client was ‘very shocked and distressed’ by this unexpected intervention from SRA. Unfortunately,…

Read More

Navigating the Complexities of International Law in a Globalized Economy

In an era characterized by rapid technological advancement and ever-evolving global regulatory landscapes, the legal sector finds itself at the crossroads. As corporations and law firms expand their activities across multiple jurisdictions, they face increasingly complex legal challenges, some of which have global implications. Take, for instance, the impact of the European Union’s General Data…

Read More

Arbitration as Litigation: Clarifying Work Product Protection Under FRCP 26(b)(3)

The question of whether arbitrations count as “litigation” for work product purposes under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) has often been a subject of heated debate amongst legal practitioners. According to the rule, protection extends to documents prepared “in anticipation of litigation or for trial.” The critical terminology under scrutiny here is “anticipation…

Read More

CMS Suspends No Surprises Act Arbitration Process for Second Time: Legal Implications in Healthcare Industry

For legal professionals across the globe, it’s imperative to stay updated with recent developments in legal news. One such noteworthy announcement is the suspension of the arbitration process for “Surprise Billing” put in place by the “No Surprises Act”. This marks the second time the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has opted to…

Read More

PAGA Plaintiffs Retain Standing Amid Individual Arbitration Shifts

In a development that resonates through the legal community, plaintiffs who launch representative claims under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), still have standing in court even after their individual claims are directed towards arbitration. This follows one month after the U.S. Supreme Court opposed California’s prohibition on enforcing agreements that mandate the…

Read More

Singapore Court Addresses Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Enforce Procedural Timelines

In a noteworthy shift of legal attitudes, Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) recently assessed the extent to which an arbitral tribunal can exclude evidence after a specific date. As the legal saying goes, arbitral tribunals have long been considered the masters of their own procedures. However, this latest judgement proposes some limitations. The case tackling…

Read More

Texas Supreme Court Backs Arbitration Clauses in Construction Disputes: Impact and Implications

In a pivotal move, the Texas Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of developers and builders looking to enforce arbitration agreements in construction cases. Two key victories gave tremendous impetus to the principle of ‘Arbitration for All’. Contrary to previous presumption, the court ruled that household members and subsequent purchasers bringing a construction defect claim…

Read More

Offshore Jurisdictions Enhance Global Legal Infrastructure Through Arbitral Award Enforcement

The enduring rise of arbitration as a chosen route for dispute resolution has led to a surging requirement for arbitral awards to be acknowledged and executed in offshore jurisdictions. This developing trend is an observation underlined by some of the world’s strongest offshore jurisdictions— Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Ireland, and…

Read More

UK Court Rejects Enforcement of California Arbitration Award, Citing Consumer Rights and Financial Markets Acts

In a noteworthy ruling, the English Commercial Court has denied recognition and enforcement of a California-seated arbitration award, opining that the enforcement would violate UK public policy. The Court stated this would be in direct conflict with principles outlined in the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000…

Read More