Constitutional – Page 14 – Legal News Feed

Law360

American Trucking Associations Urges First Circuit to Approve $21 Million Legal Fee Following Rhode Island Toll Victory

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

The American Trucking Associations (ATA) has petitioned the First Circuit to uphold a $21 million fee request made by its legal representatives at Mayer Brown LLP. The request follows significant achievements in the ongoing litigation against Rhode Island’s truck tolling program. ATA’s argument centers on the claim that the attorneys successfully achieved “substantial” victories, thereby…

SCOTUSblog

Trump Administration Abandons Supreme Court Rehearing on Birthright Citizenship Order

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

The Trump administration, contrary to prior indications, has apparently opted not to petition the Supreme Court for a rehearing on its executive order concerning birthright citizenship. The order aimed to discontinue the automatic granting of U.S. citizenship to nearly anyone born on American soil—a practice many regard as enshrined by the 14th Amendment. The order…

Bloomberg Law

Justice Gorsuch Reaffirms Supreme Court’s Dedication Amid Divided Rulings

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In the aftermath of a term marked by significant divisions, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch emphasized the justices’ deep commitment to the nation. He addressed concerns surrounding the court’s decisions, underscoring their shared dedication to upholding the Constitution and their love for the country. Justice Gorsuch’s comments came during an event hosted by the…

SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court Concurring Opinions Signal Potential Legal Shifts and Constitutional Debates

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In the latest term, some concurring opinions from the U.S. Supreme Court have sparked discussions regarding potential shifts in legal interpretations. Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a noteworthy concurring opinion in Mullin v. Doe where he challenged the application of the equal protection clause to the federal government, suggesting Bolling v. Sharpe was wrongly decided. Justice…

SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court Decisions Fuel Complex Debate Over Temporary Protected Status in the U.S.

Pieter Gunst3 months ago02 mins

The debate over Temporary Protected Status (TPS) in the United States persists as both legal and political dimensions develop. Recent Supreme Court decisions have intensified discussions around the status, particularly following the Court’s move to limit lower courts’ capacity to block the revocation of TPS. This judicial development has not silenced the battle but rather…

SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court to Weigh Trump Administration’s Contested Mail-In Voting Order

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

The Trump administration has taken its legal battle to the Supreme Court, seeking approval to enforce an executive order aimed at tightening mail-in voting regulations. The administration argues that the measures are essential to ensure election integrity, although critics claim they may disenfranchise eligible voters. The executive order, signed by President Trump, outlines new rules…

Ars Technica

Texas Online Content Regulation Law Blocked by Appeals Court Amidst Ongoing Legal Battle

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The contentious issue of regulating online content has taken another legal turn as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has blocked a Texas law requiring websites to prevent minors from accessing potentially harmful speech. The decision marked a significant win for tech industry advocates who had challenged the law’s constitutionality and practicality….

Law360

James Comey Seeks Dismissal of Indictment Over Social Media Post, Highlighting Debate on Free Speech and True Threats

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

In a recent court motion, former FBI Director James Comey has called for the dismissal of an indictment related to a social media post he made last year, arguing that it does not constitute a “true threat” to former President Donald Trump. The motion was filed in a North Carolina federal court, and it revolves…

Jurist

Federal Appeals Court Blocks Proposed $100,000 Fee on H-1B Visas, Upholding Separation of Powers Principle

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The US Court of Appeals for the First District has upheld a decision to block a proposed $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, dealing a blow to the Trump administration’s attempt to impose the additional charge. This ruling stems from a legal battle initiated by twenty states, spearheaded by California, which challenged the administration’s proclamation. The…

Jurist

South Korea’s Reproductive Rights Under Scrutiny: Calls for Legal Reforms After Abortion Case Ruling

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

Amnesty International’s recent appeal for South Korea to enhance protections for women’s reproductive rights follows a revealing decision by the Seoul High Court. The court acquitted a 26-year-old woman, identified as Kwon, who had been charged with murder, reversing a previous conviction. However, the court’s decision to maintain the convictions of medical personnel involved in…

Jurist

Amnesty International Urges Zambia to Release Journalist Detained Under Controversial Cyber Crimes Act

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

Amnesty International has called for the immediate release and dropping of charges against Zambian journalist MacPherson Mukuka, who was detained for posting a private conversation involving public servants on social media. Mukuka, associated with the Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation, was arrested on July 17 under the 2025 Cyber Crimes Act. This legislation criminalizes recording private…

Jurist

Federal Employees File Suit Against USDA Chief Over Religious Messaging

Pieter Gunst4 months ago04 mins

A coalition of federal employees and the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) is challenging the United States Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, over allegations of sending religiously charged emails to staff at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The group filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the…

Law360

Florida Appellate Court Decision Sparks Supreme Court Review on Attorney-Client Communication Rights During Recesses

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

The Florida appellate court recently decided to uphold a sexual battery conviction while recommending that the Florida Supreme Court examine a pivotal issue: the right to attorney-client communication during court recesses. This issue emerged after a trial judge barred a defendant from speaking with his attorney during such breaks, prompting a broader discussion on constitutional…

Law360

Supreme Court Ruling on Geofence Warrants Reshapes Privacy Law and Justice System Practices

Pieter Gunst4 months ago04 mins

The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to classify geofence warrants as searches under the Fourth Amendment marks a significant development in privacy law. This ruling emerges in the wake of the Hunter v. U.S. case, adding to the ongoing debate regarding the balance between law enforcement tools and constitutional rights. Geofence warrants demand…

Jurist

Former U.S. Attorney General Sues Trump Administration Over Alleged Unlawful Dismissal

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

In a significant legal confrontation, former US Attorney General Roger Rogoff has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, asserting that his abrupt dismissal shortly after his appointment as US attorney for the Western District of Washington was unlawful. Rogoff claims that his removal violates federal laws and the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, a…

Bloomberg Law

Florida Supreme Court Takes Up Crucial Right to Counsel Funding Case

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

The Florida Supreme Court is poised to address a pivotal issue concerning the right to counsel, which has stirred significant attention in the legal community. This challenge arises from a recent appellate court decision, questioning the adequacy of legal representation available to indigent defendants in the state. At the heart of this legal debate is…

SCOTUSblog

South Africa’s Constitutional Court: A Pillar of Democracy and Its Evolving Role in Governance

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

Established as a central pillar in the nation’s transition to democracy, the Constitutional Court of South Africa was set up in 1994, conducting its first official session in February 1995. This apex court serves as both an appellate court and a court of original jurisdiction. As outlined in Section 167 of South Africa’s Constitution, the…

Law.com

Federal Judge Partially Backs Voting Rights Groups Against Trump’s Mail Voting Order

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

In a significant development, a Boston federal judge has largely approved constitutional claims made by voting rights organizations against the executive order issued by former President Donald Trump aimed at restricting mail voting. According to the judge, the order is likely and imminent to cause disenfranchisement among voters. This decision signals a critical point in…

Bloomberg Law

Federal Judge’s Landmark Ruling Curtails Geofence Warrants, Champions Digital Privacy Rights

Pieter Gunst4 months ago04 mins

In a landmark decision this week, a federal judge ruled against the use of geofence warrants, marking a significant moment for personal privacy rights in the United States. Geofence warrants, which allow law enforcement to demand data from tech companies like Google in order to identify any devices within a particular geographic area, have been…

Jurist

Keiko Fujimori’s Historic Presidency: Navigating a Deeply Divided Perú

Pieter Gunst4 months ago04 mins

In a landmark decision, Keiko Fujimori has been confirmed as the first elected female President of Perú, following a narrow victory in which she secured 50.135% of the vote, edging out opponent Roberto Sánchez Palomino by a slim margin. Her upcoming inauguration signals the dawn of a new era but also underscores the intense polarization…

Law360

DOJ Seeks D.C. Circuit Intervention in Immigration Contempt Inquiry Concerning Alien Enemies Act

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

In a significant development in immigration law, the Department of Justice has implored the D.C. Circuit to curb U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s criminal contempt inquiry related to the Trump administration’s implementation of the Alien Enemies Act. The DOJ contends that the judge’s investigation has veered beyond appropriate judicial boundaries, urging either a termination or…

Bloomberg Law

Attorney Files Lawsuit Challenging USPTO’s Disciplinary Procedures, Citing Lack of Fairness and Transparency

Pieter Gunst4 months ago02 mins

An attorney has initiated legal action against the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), challenging the agency’s handling of disciplinary procedures. The lawyer argues that the current method lacks fairness and transparency, which could have broader implications for attorneys across various legal fields. The lawsuit highlights concerns regarding how disciplinary cases are managed by the…

Bloomberg Law

Senator Fetterman’s Support Catalyzes Bipartisan Confirmation of Trump-Appointed Judge

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

The recent confirmation of a federal trial court nominee, originally appointed by former President Donald Trump, has drawn particular attention due to the endorsement from Senator John Fetterman, a Democrat from Pennsylvania. This decision marks a significant example of bipartisan cooperation at a time of heightened political division in the United States. The nominee, who…

Jurist

Delhi Protests Spotlight Tensions Between State Authority and Democratic Rights

Pieter Gunst4 months ago06 mins

The recent events in the heart of India’s national capital, Delhi, have cast a stark light on the contentious dynamics between state authority and democratic dissent. A mass mobilization comprising predominantly students, branded as “cockroaches” by the Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, has sparked vigorous debate. This phrase, initially aimed at “unemployed youths and…

Jurist

France Enacts Landmark Law Banning Social Media for Under-15s, Setting Precedent in Youth Online Safety

Pieter Gunst4 months ago03 mins

In a significant move to address youth mental health and online safety, France has passed a new law prohibiting children under 15 from using social media. This directive, which also includes restrictions on mobile phone use in schools, seeks to curb issues such as cyberbullying and excessive screen time. The legislation was supported overwhelmingly and…