In a case that has captured the attention of the legal community, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to review the events that led to the fatal shooting of Bobby Jo Klum by Officer Mason Roth in Davenport, Iowa. The incident, which dates back to October 2021, involved a police pursuit after Klum, holding a…
A recent legal dispute has emerged surrounding former President Donald Trump’s authority to construct a ballroom at the White House. During recent court proceedings, US District Judge Trevor McFadden expressed skepticism regarding the legality and the extent of executive power in this matter. The issue centers on whether Trump, during his presidency, exceeded his powers…
In New Jersey, a contentious legal battle is unfolding as data brokers challenge a new law intended to protect public officials from unwarranted disclosure of their personal information. The legislation, signed by Governor Phil Murphy, seeks to restrict data brokers from selling or disclosing the home addresses and telephone numbers of judges, prosecutors, and law…
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon address a significant First Amendment challenge involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as it reviews a petition concerning the agency’s “gag rule.” This rule, a staple in SEC settlements, requires individuals who have settled fraud claims to refrain from publicly denying the allegations. Those challenging the rule…
In a recent ruling, the State Supreme Court held that judicial branches cannot override legislative funding decisions concerning the compensation of legal advocates involved in indigent defense cases. The court emphasized its position by stating, “It is not within the judiciary’s constitutionally circumscribed role to second-guess the legislature’s judgment as to the most effective system…
Perkins Coie, a law firm with deep roots in corporate governance and business advisory, reports a notable rise in both revenue and profits per equity partner (PEP), marking a successful recovery from the challenges of the past year. This financial performance comes even as the firm navigates significant complexities, including a merger and high-profile litigation….
The Canadian judiciary landscape features a pivotal institution: the Supreme Court of Canada, a paramount body consisting of nine judges, inclusive of a chief justice and eight puisne judges. The term “puisne” translates to “later born” in old French, indicating judges ranked below the chief justice. The appointment of these justices follows a structured process…
In the realm of Supreme Court advocacy, citations are far from being mere references; they represent strategic moves designed to lend credibility, establish doctrinal frameworks, and influence justices’ reasoning. An analysis of 191 parties’ merits briefs, citing 3,482 cases over the court’s 2024 term, reveals how citations illustrate the dynamics and evolution of advocacy before…
Myanmar’s parliament reconvened for the first time since the military coup, a significant development following contested national elections orchestrated under military oversight. This legislative session marks a formal resumption of political proceedings, raising various legal and constitutional questions regarding the legitimacy of the newly formed legislative body. The elections held by the junta have drawn…
In a recent development that has sparked widespread debate, President Trump and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr have called for more favorable media coverage of the ongoing war in Iran. This request has raised significant concerns about press freedom and the role of the government in regulating media content. Chairman Carr issued a…
On Monday, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts decided against permitting state judges to increase hourly rates for court-appointed attorneys. This decision comes amidst growing concerns over a dearth of appointed lawyers in some of the state’s busiest counties, creating challenges within the legal system. The proposal aimed to address the shortage by offering financial…
JURIST, a distinguished law student-powered international legal news organization, is steadfast in its 30th Anniversary celebration with a compelling webinar series dedicated to the rule of law, human rights, and international justice. The highlight of this series includes an engaging discussion featuring Justice Richard J. Goldstone, known for his pivotal role in shaping the landscape…
In an analytical discourse on the principles underpinning U.S. birthright citizenship, brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar have offered a pointed rebuttal to claims made by attorney Pete Patterson in a recent SCOTUSblog post. The Amar brothers dissect several misconceptions posed by Patterson, particularly concerning the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Patterson asserts that the 14th…
In a recent decision by the Tenth Circuit, U.S. Circuit Judge Timothy Tymkovich’s dissent has raised significant constitutional concerns regarding the implications of the court’s ruling on the Federal Reserve’s master account access. The case centers on the delicate balance between state and federal authority over banking regulations, a matter that remains critical for the…
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently navigating possible shifts in its approach to the Voting Rights Act (VRA), specifically regarding Section 2 and its application to vote dilution in redistricting. A case that is drawing attention is Louisiana v. Callais, where there is a potential that the Court may limit Section 2’s effectiveness or declare…
In a noteworthy legal maneuver, Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman is taking her battle against suspension to the U.S. Supreme Court. Her appeal arises in response to a disciplinary suspension from her own colleagues, a decision she claims should be subject to judicial review. The appeal invites scrutiny on whether judicial actions against a sitting…
The District of Columbia’s Board on Professional Responsibility recently filed ethical charges against Ed Martin, the Trump-appointed pardon attorney for the US Department of Justice. The charges, made public on Tuesday, center around Martin’s controversial correspondence with Georgetown University Law Center (GULC) in early 2025. In a series of letters, Martin allegedly violated his professional…
In recent weeks, judges across the United States have been grappling with what can be described as “extraordinary times,” as they confront escalating efforts by Donald Trump and his allies to challenge legal proceedings. This development is testing the boundaries of the judicial system, introducing complexities rarely seen in the courthouse. According to a report…
The legal community is witnessing an intriguing development as Judge Pauline Newman, the oldest active federal judge, takes her case to the Supreme Court in a bid to reclaim her position. Judge Newman, who has been a significant figure in the US judiciary, faces allegations about her mental fitness to serve, which she vehemently contests….
The nomination of Melissa Holyoak to serve as the United States Attorney for the District of Utah has progressed to the full Senate for consideration. Holyoak, who has been serving as the interim U.S. Attorney since November 17, 2025, was appointed to this role by Attorney General Pamela Bondi. Prior to her interim appointment, she…
Recent remarks by President Donald Trump illustrate a historical trend of presidents clashing with the Supreme Court. During a roundtable discussion at the White House, Trump criticized the justices after they invalidated his signature tariffs, claiming their actions have harmed the nation. While his criticism may appear intense, Trump is not the first president to…
In a significant legal development, a California federal judge has dismissed Ford Motor Co.’s revamped lawsuit accusing three attorneys linked to Knight Law Group LLP of a large-scale fraudulent scheme in lemon law cases. The court decided that the attorneys’ actions in pursuing these cases were protected under the First Amendment. The implication of this…
Free speech on university campuses emerges as a contentious issue, particularly amid protests such as those concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at institutions like Ball State University, Harvard, and Columbia. The discourse encompasses offensive speech, harassment under Titles VI and IX, and structures like bias response teams, all while raising questions about the extent of constitutional…
The doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the U.S. Constitution appears increasingly illusory in times of war, as observed in the United States’ recent military actions in Iran. According to Erwin Chemerinsky in SCOTUSblog, President Donald Trump exemplified this trend by engaging in military activities without seeking congressional approval. Historically, decisions regarding war required…
At a recent judicial conference, Chief Justice John Roberts faced pointed inquiries from Democratic lawmakers concerning the escalating threats against federal judges and the Supreme Court’s recent decisions. The judiciary’s top administrator expressed “serious and urgent concerns” about the increasing intimidation directed at judges, highlighting the potential risks to judicial independence. Over the past few…