In a recent session, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision to deny certiorari for a number of cases, leaving unresolved issues to lower courts and providing an important signal about the judicial priorities of the country’s highest court. Among the cases left off the docket were disputes involving hefty sanctions, regulations surrounding interstate wine…
Foley Hoag, a prominent law firm known for its expertise in litigation and regulatory affairs, has been retained to defend Maryland Governor Wes Moore in a defamation lawsuit. This high-profile case has its roots in allegations made by Cindy Williams, a former state employee, who claims that Moore made false statements that damaged her reputation….
The nomination of former President Donald Trump’s pick for the Fifth Circuit, Judge Cory Wilson, has encountered early skepticism from conservative quarters. Wilson, nominated in 2019, was anticipated to align closely with conservative judicial philosophies. However, recent developments indicate that his views on certain legal interpretations have come under scrutiny from right-leaning groups. Wilson’s judicial…
A federal judge has ordered an immediate halt to the Trump Administration’s taxpayer-funded television ads, citing potential constitutional violations. According to JURIST, U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that not only stops the current series of ads but also bars any future ad purchases by the administration or anyone associated…
In an evolving landscape where Southeast Asian nations are moving away from the death penalty, Singapore’s stance has positioned it increasingly as an outlier. Amnesty International’s recent observations underscore this shift. As the World Day Against the Death Penalty approaches on October 10, a growing number of ASEAN countries are reevaluating their approach to capital…
The Florida Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of imposing bar examination fees on veteran lawyers who seek admission to practice law in the state. This decision was rendered despite arguments suggesting that the fees discriminate against attorneys who are otherwise seasoned legal professionals. In a detailed ruling, the court emphasized that these fees serve…
The authority of the United States Supreme Court to have the final say on the constitutionality of legislation is a topic of enduring debate. Critics argue that the justices’ assumed power to have the last word is not explicitly grounded in the Constitution itself, yet it profoundly impacts various social, economic, and political spheres. These…
The U.S. Supreme Court’s October sitting has commenced with significant attention from various sectors, as observers look towards the cases reviewed in this term. This session’s docket displays a diverse range of cases, including those with potential wide-ranging effects on commerce regulations and social issues. An important development involves a bipartisan group of states, alongside…
U.S. District Judge Roy K. Altman, speaking to a group of attorneys in Florida, described the October 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel as an “inflection point” for the United States. His remarks coincided with the release of his new book, examining the shifting dynamics in public discourse and legal interpretations surrounding the conflict’s events. The…
A group of current and former students from Lincoln University of Missouri (LU) have initiated legal proceedings against the state, accusing it of deliberately underfunding their institution in a manner that perpetuates racial inequities in higher education. The plaintiffs argue that this ongoing financial neglect is part of a broader pattern of historical segregation practices…
The Federal Circuit has recently examined the challenge presented by an inventor regarding the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) much-debated Sensitive Application Warning System (SAWS). This now-defunct program, which flagged certain patent applications as sensitive, allegedly disrupted his application for a patent concerning an internal combustion engine, raising questions about potential constitutional violations. During…
In a recent legal victory that underscores the complex intersection of technology and civil liberties, a federal jury in Texas awarded Alek Schott $76 following a lawsuit against Bexar County and its sheriff’s office. Schott, who was detained for 76 minutes during a traffic stop initiated by the use of automated license plate readers (ALPR),…
The recent decision by the Kosovo Assembly to pass amendments limiting the jurisdiction of the Specialist Chambers has sparked concerns from the European Union, which claims these changes conflict with Kosovo’s international obligations. An EU spokesperson highlighted that Kosovo must adhere to its commitments, ensuring the court’s existing mandate and independence remain intact. This court…
Senior U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White has announced his retirement, set for the end of this year, concluding nearly 24 years on the federal bench in Northern California. Appointed by President George W. Bush in 2002, Judge White has presided over numerous significant cases, impacting various sectors including technology, environmental law, and civil rights….
In a pivotal court session, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., deliberated over ABC’s challenge to an accelerated review of its broadcast licenses by the FCC, which could have significant ramifications for media regulation. The courtroom debate centered around whether the FCC’s sudden demand for early license renewals from ABC-owned stations represents an overstepping of…
This summer marked a significant milestone for the Joseph E. Zaytoun International Judicial Clerkship Initiative as the inaugural cohort completed placements across the Supreme Court of Namibia, as well as in Ghana and Rwanda. Spearheaded by Campbell Law School Dean Rich Leonard, this program represents decades of judicial-reform work in Africa. Notably, the initiative received…
A judge of Spain’s Supreme Court has lifted the national arrest warrants against former Catalan regional president Carles Puigdemont, marking a significant legal development in his ongoing legal saga. This decision comes after nearly nine years since Puigdemont fled Spain following the 2017 Catalan independence referendum. The ruling by Pablo Llarena, the investigating magistrate in…
“`html As the U.S. Supreme Court kicks off its 2026-27 term, the first set of relistings for the year was announced, serving as a key indicator of cases that could receive heightened scrutiny. On Friday, the docket for the conference featured exactly 100 cases and applications, out of which 14 are actual relists. Thirteen of…
As the U.S. Supreme Court opens its session on October 8, 2026, legal professionals and scholars are closely monitoring a docket that promises to address several pivotal issues. The session begins amidst a landscape marked by significant political and social shifts, reflecting the ongoing evolution of American legal and constitutional thought. Today, the Court is…
The evolution of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment over the past two decades, as detailed in this SCOTUSblog article, has reflected dramatic shifts in American constitutional law. The Supreme Court has altered its stance on equal protection, substantive due process, and birthright citizenship, resulting in significant implications for various legal doctrines. Equal…
The U.S. Supreme Court’s deliberations in Anderson v. Intel Corp Investment Policy Committee reveal a discernible skepticism towards challenges involving the fiduciary choices of employee retirement funds, particularly when the claims lack comparative performance evidence against similar investment strategies. The plaintiffs in this case argue that Intel’s fiduciaries departed from conventional practices by heavily investing…
In a pivotal move, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently petitioned the Supreme Court to uphold existing precedents that permit states to employ juries with fewer than 12 members in serious criminal cases. This plea by the DOJ underscores the potential significant disruptions that could arise should this long-standing practice be overturned. Unsettling thousands…
In a recent decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reaffirmed the state’s $250,000 cap on damages recoverable from the state government. The 5-2 decision underscored the legislature’s constitutional authority to enforce such a limit. Yet, the court simultaneously called for legislative action to address potential inequities arising from the cap’s current level. The ruling comes from…
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently addressing a pivotal question regarding the jurisdictional boundaries for constitutional challenges to laws affecting veterans’ benefits. This debate was ignited during an oral argument session in the case of Johnson v. United States Congress. The issue at hand is whether federal district courts can hear constitutional challenges to statutes…
The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to address issues impacting Guam through the case of Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guåhan, which questions whether federal law obliges the U.S. Air Force to adhere to the comprehensive environmental and community consultation standards under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when disposing of hazardous munitions….