U.S. Court’s Tariff Ruling Highlights Need for Legislative Clarification on Executive Trade Powers

The recent tariff decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade offers an intriguing glimpse into the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches regarding trade policy. However, this decision appears to do little in constraining the unilateral actions that characterized the trade policy during the Trump administration. A full analysis can be…

Read More

Trump’s Proposed Land Port Tax Stirs Debate on Trade Impact and Infrastructure Funding

Recent proposals by former President Donald Trump to implement a new tax on land ports have sparked debate among legal experts and policymakers on its potential implications. The proposal is seen by some as an alternative to tariffs, which have historically been a contentious issue in international trade. Trump’s proposed tax aims to fund maintenance…

Read More

U.S. Customs Decision on Tourniquet Imports Reflects Strategic IP Adaptation

The recent decision by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) marks a significant development in the ongoing dispute over tourniquet imports. CBP determined that a redesigned tourniquet introduced by a Chinese manufacturer no longer violates the import ban previously issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). This ban originated due to the determination that…

Read More

Supreme Court Ruling on Tariffs Offers Short-lived Clarity for Dealmakers Amid Renewed Trade Uncertainty

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to invalidate tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) marks a significant development for dealmakers. Previously, these tariffs created considerable uncertainty in mergers and acquisitions, particularly concerning the potential for pursuing refund rights. With the ruling, there is newfound clarity in how these transactions can incorporate…

Read More

Navigating the Aftermath: Legal and Financial Implications of Overturned Trump Tariffs

The recent decision to overturn tariffs imposed during the Trump administration has instigated a complex debate over the distribution of refunds to affected businesses. This legal shift raises pivotal questions about eligibility and the procedural aspects of obtaining refunds. The ruling comes after the US Court of International Trade questioned the legitimacy of these tariffs…

Read More

Trump Administration’s Reversal on DOJ Tariff Refund Assurances Raises Urgency for Businesses

The legal landscape around tariff refunds has taken a new turn as the Trump administration moves to retract prior assurances from the Department of Justice. Corporate legal departments and international trade attorneys are advised to act swiftly to secure potential refunds following the rollback of these commitments. Under the previous assurances, many businesses sought refunds…

Read More

Trump Announces 10% Global Tariff Following Supreme Court Setback on Trade Powers

In a significant development, President Donald Trump has announced a 10% global tariff following the US Supreme Court’s ruling that curtailed his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for imposing tariffs. The Court’s decision, described by Trump as “deeply disappointing,” invalidated his previous use of IEEPA to justify tariffs that were primarily…

Read More

Seventh Circuit’s Reluctance in E-Commerce Jurisdiction Cases Raises Questions Over Global Digital Trade Laws

In a recent development, the Seventh Circuit panel expressed reluctance over intervening in jurisdictional concerns involving two major e-commerce counterfeiting cases. The cases hinge on the use of so-called “Schedule A” to combat counterfeit products sold by anonymous online vendors. In litigation targeting these vendors, the issue of jurisdiction has emerged prominently, leading to legal…

Read More

Supreme Court Invalidates Trump’s Tariffs, Reinforces Separation of Powers in Landmark Ruling

In a significant legal development, the US Supreme Court recently invalidated former President Donald Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The decision, reached by a 6-3 majority, clarified that the IEEPA does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs, marking a pivotal moment in the separation of powers debate…

Read More

Supreme Court Invalidates Trump’s Tariffs, Affirming Congressional Authority Over Trade Taxes

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that President Donald Trump’s extensive tariff program is illegal, delivering a significant setback to a central component of his economic policy. The 6-3 decision, issued on February 20, 2026, found that the administration exceeded its authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing broad import taxes…

Read More

Supreme Court Tariff Case May Reshape U.S. Trade Policy, Legal Experts Warn

As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to deliberate on a significant tariff case, legal professionals across the industry are advising their corporate clients to brace for potential upheaval. The imminent decision could considerably affect the regulatory landscape, especially impacting how import duties are assigned and contested. The case under review involves a challenge to the…

Read More

Federal Circuit Court’s Ruling Highlights Importance of Timely Appeals in Trade Disputes

The recent dismissal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of a portion of Crocs Inc.’s appeal from an International Trade Commission (ITC) determination serves as an instructive reminder about the stringent timelines that govern such appeals. The court found a segment of Crocs’ appeal untimely, emphasizing the importance of adhering to…

Read More

Strategies for Avoiding Tariff Evasion Risks in Global Trade Compliance

In an era where global trade dynamics are constantly evolving, businesses are increasingly challenged by the complexities of tariff compliance. The risk of tariff evasion liability is a pressing concern for companies striving to adapt to shifting regulatory landscapes. Understanding the risks and adopting robust compliance strategies can help mitigate potential legal repercussions. Avoiding tariffs…

Read More

USPTO Director Halts Redundant Patent Review, Emphasizing Efficiency in Litigation Process

In a notable procedure impacting patent litigation, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director, John Squires, opted to terminate an Inter Partes Review (IPR) concerning a skin treatment patent held by Hydrafacial LLC. This decision followed a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) judge’s rejection of a validity challenge against the patent. The outcome arose…

Read More

“U.S. Supreme Court Faces Political Challenges Amidst Global Labeling Disputes”

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently on its winter recess, providing a temporary pause to its otherwise packed agenda. In a recent overseas development, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled against Oatly, preventing the plant-based company from using the word “milk” in its marketing campaigns. The decision highlights ongoing global debates over the…

Read More

U.S. ITC Reverses Ruling in Patent Case Against Chinese Importer, Heightening Trade Tensions

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has reactivated patent infringement claims against a Chinese importer of fluoride resin products, overturning a prior ruling by an administrative law judge. The ruling concerns allegations by Syensqo, a chemical company, which argues that the Chinese firm is infringing on its patents by importing resin products into the United…

Read More

Greenberg Traurig Expands Trade Expertise with Strategic Acquisition of Foley Hoag Partners

Greenberg Traurig, a prestigious global law firm, has recently strengthened its trade practice by welcoming two prominent attorneys from Foley Hoag. This strategic acquisition enhances the firm’s capabilities in New York and Washington, D.C. Timothy Brightbill and Laura Siegel Rabinowitz, both seasoned experts in international trade law, are the latest additions to Greenberg Traurig’s team….

Read More

Trump Administration Nominates New Judges, Strengthening Republican Influence in Federal Courts

In a significant move within the federal judiciary, President Donald Trump announced new nominations for district court judgeships in South Carolina, Montana, and the Virgin Islands. These nominations also include a candidate for the International Trade Court. The nominated individuals have deep connections to the Republican Party and the White House, reflecting a continuation of…

Read More

Trump’s Judicial Nominees Signal Continued Conservative Influence in U.S. Courts

President Donald Trump has put forward a slate of district court nominees for South Carolina, Montana, and the Virgin Islands, along with a nominee for the International Trade Court. These selections include prominent figures connected to the Republican National Committee and the White House. In a move closely watched by the legal community, Trump’s nominations…

Read More

Supreme Court Deliberates Historic Ruling on Presidential Tariff Powers

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recently offered a rare glimpse into the ongoing deliberations over a significant impending ruling regarding former President Donald Trump’s exercise of emergency tariff powers. Discussing the issue during a television interview, Justice Jackson revealed that the justices are diligently crafting a decision that holds substantial weight in this…

Read More

Trump Nominates Key Voices to U.S. International Trade Commission Amidst Crucial Economic Policy Shifts

U.S. President Donald Trump has recently nominated two individuals to serve as commissioners on the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). This move places key trade policy positions under his purview as he rounds out his administration’s appointments during his term. One nominee is a counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives’ intellectual property subcommittee, while…

Read More