US Court of International Trade Grants Temporary Relief on Trump-Era Tariffs, Importers Await Refund Resolution

A recent decision from the US Court of International Trade has temporarily buoyed the spirits of importers seeking refunds on tariffs. The court’s order paused the liquidation of certain import duties, specifically targeting goods from China that were subjected to tariffs under the Trump administration. This move offers a potential financial reprieve for affected companies…

Read More

Rising Workload for Trade Lawyers Amid Iran-Related Regulatory Pressures

The mounting tensions surrounding Iran have led to a noticeable increase in workloads for trade lawyers. As geopolitical complexities intensify, legal professionals find themselves navigating an evolving landscape of sanctions, compliance requirements, and international trade regulations. This surge in legal activity can be attributed to the uncertain geopolitical environment that has taken shape following recent…

Read More

ITC Launches Investigation Into Patent Infringement Claims Against Major Tech Firms

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced its decision to investigate the claims made by AX Wireless against several technology companies, including ASUSTeK and TP-Link Systems Inc. The inquiry will focus on whether laptops, routers, and other computer products imported by these companies infringe upon AX Wireless’s five patents. This development underscores the ongoing complexities…

Read More

Court Ruling Challenges U.S. Tariff Calculations Under Emergency Economic Powers Act

A recent legal decision may significantly impact U.S. import tariffs, as a judge has instructed the government to cease its calculation of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for importers. This ruling comes from the Court of International Trade, marking a notable shift in the interpretation of the IEEPA’s application to trade…

Read More

U.S. Trade Commission Launches Investigation Into Alleged Patent Infringement by Chinese Electric Unicycle Makers

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation into allegations brought by Inventist Inc. and its partner, Alien Rides, regarding the importation of electric unicycles from five Chinese companies. The claim suggests that these imports infringe on two of Inventist’s patents, placing the spotlight on intellectual property rights in the burgeoning market of…

Read More

Genentech vs. Biocon: Legal Battle Over Cancer Drug Patents Tests U.S. Trade Policies

Biotechnology giant Genentech Inc. has initiated legal proceedings against Indian pharmaceutical company Biocon Ltd., alleging that Biocon was importing drugs into the United States that infringe on Genentech’s patents. The contested patents pertain to treatments for breast cancer, a vital area of the biotech landscape where intellectual property rights are fiercely defended. Genentech has approached…

Read More

ITC Launches Inquiry into Alleged Patent Infringement by Arizona Semiconductor Firm

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation into allegations that an Arizona-based semiconductor company has imported memory chips infringing on patents held by a competitor from California. This probe highlights the ongoing tension and complexities within the semiconductor industry, especially concerning intellectual property rights. The complaint, filed by the California company, asserts…

Read More

Navigating Tariff Evasion Consequences: Legal Defense Strategies Amid Tightening Trade Regulations

Trade non-compliance, particularly in the form of tariff evasion, can shift from a regulatory issue to a criminal prosecution, posing significant legal challenges. As trade regulations tighten globally, businesses and their legal counsel must be prepared to defend against such charges effectively. One of the primary defenses in tariff evasion cases is demonstrating a lack…

Read More

Major Law Firms Challenge Trump-Era Tariffs in Landmark Refund Pursuit

As the Trump administration’s trade policies continue to reverberate through the business landscape, a notable legal initiative has emerged. Major law firms, Crowell & Moring LLP and Sidley Austin LLP, have taken prominent roles in leading the charge against tariffs imposed during the Trump era, seeking refunds for affected companies. This legal endeavor underscores the…

Read More

Supreme Court Ruling Spurs Wave of Lawsuits Over Disputed Tariffs, Leading to Legal Industry Surge

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision questioning the legality of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a surge of litigation has emerged as importers seek refunds for duties paid. Prominent law firms, including Crowell & Moring, Polsinelli, Hogan Lovells, Holland & Knight, and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman,…

Read More

“Supreme Court Tariff Ruling Highlights Legal Prowess of Milbank, Wilson Sonsini, and Akin Gump”

This week, Milbank LLP, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP have garnered attention as the prominent Legal Lions, recognized by well-regarded legal news outlet Law360. Their appearance follows the recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down tariffs that were imposed under the International Emergency…

Read More

USITC Investigates China’s Trade Practices and PNTR Status Amid Evolving U.S.-China Relations

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has initiated two investigations concerning China’s trade practices, focusing on the biotechnology sector and the potential revocation of China’s Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status. The first investigation, titled “Impact on U.S. Industry of China’s State Support and Pricing Practices in the Biotechnology Sector,” aims to assess how Chinese…

Read More

DLA Piper Strengthens Debt Finance Expertise with Key Hire Amidst Rising Market Demand

DLA Piper has taken a significant step in enhancing its debt finance capabilities by bringing on board Sudipram Ramanathan, a leading debt lawyer from Akin Gump. This move underscores DLA Piper’s strategic focus on strengthening its finance practices amid growing demand for complex debt restructuring and financing expertise. Ramanathan’s decision to join DLA Piper aligns…

Read More

Legal Dispute Over Tariff Refunds Calls for Clarification on Distribution Rights

A recent tariff ruling has set the stage for a complex legal dispute involving the allocation of substantial refund sums. The ruling has left companies and stakeholders grappling with how to fairly divide the financial recoveries resulting from what had been deemed excess tariff payments. Legal experts are closely examining the implications for corporate clients…

Read More

Rushing McCarl LLP Strengthens Litigation Team with Alston & Bird Partner Acquisition

In a notable shift within the Los Angeles legal scene, Rushing McCarl LLP, a business litigation boutique, is expanding its team by welcoming a new partner from Alston & Bird LLP. The news, announced on Tuesday, underscores Rushing McCarl’s ongoing strategy to bolster its litigation capabilities amidst growing demands for specialized legal expertise. The move…

Read More

FedEx Challenges Tariffs in Federal Court, Citing Supreme Court Decision Against Trump Administration

FedEx has initiated legal proceedings against the Trump administration to reclaim tariffs paid in alignment with executive orders issued in 2025. The logistics giant filed its lawsuit in the US Court of International Trade, aiming to secure a full refund of duties deemed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). FedEx argues that these…

Read More

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Against Trump-Era Tariff Policy Spurs Legal and Strategic Reassessment

Legal professionals and corporate strategists are closely monitoring the ripple effects of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that invalidated the Trump administration’s expansive tariff framework. While the immediate focus has been on the complex process of managing refunds, experts anticipate that the court’s ruling will trigger a multitude of private commercial disputes and could…

Read More

Law Firms Face Surge in Client Inquiries Following Landmark Tariff Ruling

In the aftermath of a recent tariff ruling, major law firms are facing an influx of client inquiries, underscoring the widespread concern among businesses navigating complex trade regulations. Aaron Cummings, a shareholder at Brownstein, mentioned that nearly all clients at the firm, which counts thousands, are keenly interested in understanding the implications. This surge in…

Read More

U.S. Court’s Tariff Ruling Highlights Need for Legislative Clarification on Executive Trade Powers

The recent tariff decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade offers an intriguing glimpse into the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches regarding trade policy. However, this decision appears to do little in constraining the unilateral actions that characterized the trade policy during the Trump administration. A full analysis can be…

Read More

Trump’s Proposed Land Port Tax Stirs Debate on Trade Impact and Infrastructure Funding

Recent proposals by former President Donald Trump to implement a new tax on land ports have sparked debate among legal experts and policymakers on its potential implications. The proposal is seen by some as an alternative to tariffs, which have historically been a contentious issue in international trade. Trump’s proposed tax aims to fund maintenance…

Read More

U.S. Customs Decision on Tourniquet Imports Reflects Strategic IP Adaptation

The recent decision by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) marks a significant development in the ongoing dispute over tourniquet imports. CBP determined that a redesigned tourniquet introduced by a Chinese manufacturer no longer violates the import ban previously issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). This ban originated due to the determination that…

Read More