Judges across various jurisdictions are increasingly considering a “pro-taxpayer” approach when interpreting ambiguous tax statutes. This momentum is notably gaining traction in light of recent court opinions that seek to mitigate the complexities and perceived biases inherent in tax law. The approach advocates for resolving ambiguous tax provisions in favor of the taxpayer, challenging the…
The legal landscape continually seeks methods to streamline costs and enhance efficiency during litigation. One emerging approach is the incorporation of “baseball arbitration” in resolving discovery disputes. This arbitration method, initially designed for salary negotiations in Major League Baseball, requires each party to propose an outcome, with the arbitrator then choosing between them. The simplicity…
The legal community is abuzz following the reprimand of seasoned attorneys from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, who have been sanctioned significantly in a high-profile discovery dispute. The case, overseen by a California magistrate judge, criticized the firm’s manner of communication with its adversaries. The judge’s sharply worded comments pointed to “troubling” omissions in case citations,…
The intricate doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting is currently poised for potential clarification by the Federal Circuit. This intricacy has been amplified by a recent decision juxtaposed with a brief from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), each appearing to diverge on a critical aspect of the doctrine. This scenario could prompt the Federal…
Polsinelli PC faces challenges in representing a patent-holding doctor in ongoing lawsuits initiated by two medical device companies. These companies accuse both Polsinelli and its client of aggressively pursuing “bad faith” intellectual property claims. In response, motions have been filed in federal courts in Tennessee and Mississippi to disqualify Polsinelli from defending the doctor. The…
Two medical device companies are pursuing legal action against Polsinelli PC and its client, a patent-holding doctor, alleging “bad faith” patent infringement. These companies have filed motions in federal courts in Tennessee and Mississippi seeking to disqualify Polsinelli from representing the doctor, citing conflicts due to “diverging interests and liabilities.” This litigation highlights ongoing concerns…
In a recent legal proceeding, former Arizona U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema faced scrutiny over a Signal app exchange while defending against a lawsuit in North Carolina. The case revolves around an alleged affair with her married security guard, which has been at the forefront of a legal battle to determine jurisdiction over personal conduct across…
The Federal Circuit recently clarified the responsibilities of nonpracticing entities (NPEs), ruling that they are not exempt from adhering to the Patent Act’s marking requirements. The court decision, delivered on Wednesday, addresses the contentious issue of whether NPEs can bypass the patent marking obligation when seeking pre-suit damages, even if their licensees claim non-infringement. In…
The Federal Circuit recently clarified the obligations of nonpracticing entities (NPEs) concerning the marking requirements stipulated by the Patent Act. On Wednesday, the court ruled that NPEs cannot sidestep the obligation to mark products with patent information, even if their licensees believe their products do not infringe. This decision underscores a significant responsibility for NPEs…
This summer, corporate travel policies in the United States have come under scrutiny following a decision by a federal judge in New York. Paired with developments in an unprecedented federal prosecution in Georgia, these legal moves have intensified concerns for corporations whose employees transport electronic devices across U.S. borders. Such cases are prompting a reevaluation…
Harvard University has agreed to a $53 million settlement with families involved in a lawsuit concerning the misuse of donated bodies by a former morgue manager. This legal resolution stems from incidents where body parts, intended for educational purposes through the Harvard Medical School Anatomical Gift Program, were reportedly sold illicitly on the black market….
An attorney and her former mentor have reached a settlement following the dismissal of a lawsuit involving allegations of sexual harassment and employment discrimination. This outcome materialized after the plaintiff’s case was dismissed last month due to repeated discovery violations, a significant procedural setback that effectively precluded trial. The case, which had drawn attention within…
The recent decision by the Tenth Circuit in KetoNatural Pet Foods Inc. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. could significantly impact how courts interpret false advertising claims related to hyperlink disclosures. This July 14 ruling has raised questions about the applicability of the “two clicks” rule, which traditionally offered a guideline for how far material information…
Jon McMichael, a distinguished attorney at Fenwick & West LLP, has swiftly emerged as a formidable force in intellectual property law. Recently recognized by Law360 as one of the top intellectual property attorneys under 40, McMichael’s achievements have been nothing short of remarkable. His work in securing a $34 million patent verdict for Lashify stands…
In 2026, the UK’s legal landscape is witnessing a fascinating array of high-stakes cases that are capturing the attention of major law firms and corporations. Data from Solomonic reveals the top 20 claims shaping this year, drawing significant interest from seasoned legal professionals. The cases involve diverse areas including financial disputes, intellectual property, and competition…
The recent nomination of candidates for the Deputy Attorney General position by Trump legal adviser Joseph Blanche may reignite a contentious debate around the settlement fund structure within the Department of Justice (DOJ). This development has captured the attention of legal professionals and corporate counsel, as it could lead to a reevaluation of compensation mechanisms…
DLA Piper has announced the addition of veteran white-collar defense attorney Jonathan B. Bruce to its Washington office. This strategic hire aims to bolster the firm’s capabilities in the arena of defense against corporate penalties and compliance issues. Bruce’s extensive experience in managing complex litigation and regulatory challenges makes him a notable enhancement to DLA…
A coalition of Florida Republicans has brought forward a legal challenge to the U.S. Census Bureau, escalating the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal court dismissed their earlier lawsuit. The crux of the litigation concerns the 2020 census, where the plaintiffs argue that the Census Bureau’s reliance on statistical methods, such as…
In the legal world, transitions between in-house positions and private practice can offer fresh perspectives and strategic advantages to law firms. In a recent development, Bill LeSuer, formerly serving as a senior counsel at Kemper Corporation, has rejoined the ranks of Troutman Pepper’s Chicago office. His return marks a notable shift, reflective of broader trends…
In the legal profession, there exists a significant disparity between the theoretical framework taught in law schools and the practical challenges faced in the courtroom. While academic curriculums comprehensively cover topics from civil procedure to the doctrine of stare decisis, certain pragmatic aspects remain largely unaddressed, particularly the endurance required to navigate lengthy trials. One…
In the world of legal education, students are meticulously trained to understand the machinations of civil procedure and the doctrine of stare decisis. Yet, as many seasoned attorneys can attest, the journey from law school to the courtroom often reveals significant gaps, particularly in enduring the marathon of lengthy trials. A recent discussion on navigating…
The intensifying debate over the Trump administration’s immigration detention policy is poised to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. The focal point of the controversy is the policy instituted by the Trump administration on mandatory detention of migrants living in the United States without governmental permission, a move that has sparked significant legal challenges from migrant…
The Supreme Court’s emergency docket has increasingly captured attention, encompassing more than high-profile cases involving federal policies or capital offenses. Its scope is rather diverse, handling a wide array of applications ranging from deportation proceedings to financial disagreements and election disputes. An example illustrating the docket’s diversity recently unfolded when an application was brought before…
Greenberg Traurig has bolstered its litigation group with the addition of former Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney Renato Mariotti. Known for his high-profile cases, Mariotti’s transition to Greenberg Traurig from his prior role signifies an expansion of the firm’s litigation capabilities. His experience in handling complex legal matters aligns well with the firm’s strategic interests…
The Delaware Chancery Court remains a pivotal arena for corporate litigation, exerting significant influence on American corporate law. Recently, it has been tackling complex disputes involving multibillion-dollar mergers, corporate oversight, and litigation concerning special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). Known for its specialized jurisdiction over corporate matters, this court plays a crucial role in interpreting and…