This November, there have been several key developments in ERISA litigation. Here are five of the most significant highlights.
-
The first highlight pertains to petitions for attorneys’ fees. In many ongoing cases, the question of who should bear the cost of litigation has become a matter of contention.
-
The next highlight involves self-reported evidence of disability that courts have found unpersuasive. In complex cases involving disability claims, there has been continued skepticism regarding the validity of claimant-provided evidence.
-
The third highlight is about a dilatory attempt to augment the administrative record. There has been an increase in instances where parties attempt to delay proceedings by attempting to supplement the record with additional information.
It’s both an exciting and challenging time in ERISA litigation field. For professionals working in corporations and law firms, keeping abreast of these developments is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge and being well-prepared for any potential implications to your business or that of your clients’.
For full details of these cases and even more insights into recent important highlights in ERISA litigation, follow the link to the article produced by Saul Ewing LLP.