On Thursday, the Fifth Circuit declined to momentarily halt a contentious new Mississippi statute. The law, which is facing appeals from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and other groups, provides the predominantly white state government increased authority over the legal system in the state’s largely Black capital city.
The appeals court found that the appellants were unlikely to succeed in their legal challenge, due to a lack of sufficient standing to pursue their claims. The law, known as House Bill 1020 (H.B. 1020), establishes a new “inferior court” intended to address crime in the Capitol Complex Improvement District (CCID). The appellants argued that the court would be less accountable to the local government, resulting in injury to their interests protected by the Constitution. However, the Fifth Circuit disagreed, stating the claim was unsupported by law or reason.
The groups also alleged that the legislation robs local officials of their power. However, the court found this assertion baseless. Furthermore, the NAACP’s assertion of suffering stigmatic harm failed to satisfy the Fifth Circuit’s requirement of discriminatory treatment allegation for standing based on stigmatic harm.
The NAACP and other groups argued that the benefits of the new CCID court would predominantly serve a disproportionately white population. But the NAACP failed to illustrate what barrier had been erected here, according to the Fifth Circuit.
Proponents of the legislation, primarily Republicans, have argued that it is aimed at reducing a judicial backlog and combating persistent violent crime in the capital city. Meanwhile, opposing groups such as the ACLU argue that the appointments will dilute the power of the elected Black judges and violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Despite the controversial nature of the legislation and the surrounding legal battles, a representative for Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch welcomed the court’s swift consideration of the matter and emphasized the law’s potential benefits for the people of Jackson.
For more information about the case, please click here.