The U.S. Supreme Court’s choice to engage with the trademark dispute concerning PepsiCo’s “Mtn Dew Rise Energy” marks a pivotal moment in clarifying the jury’s role in determining the inherent strength of trademarks. This issue has been delineated as a significant point, potentially impacting how often trademark infringement cases endure the test of summary judgment….
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a complex trademark dispute involving PepsiCo and Rise Brewing Co., the manufacturer of Rise nitro cold-brew coffee, which raises pivotal questions about trademark law. The crux of the case concerns whether the inherent strength of a trademark, when assessing the likelihood of consumer confusion, should be determined…
In a significant development in intellectual property enforcement, a Connecticut federal judge has imposed sanctions on a New Haven flea market operator for selling counterfeit Louis Vuitton merchandise. The sanctions follow a violation of a 2018 settlement in which the operator agreed to cease such sales. The operator further compounded the issue by failing to…
The Western District of Texas (WDTX) has become a focal point in U.S. patent litigation, primarily due to the strategies and decisions of Judge Alan Albright, who presided over numerous high-profile cases. As he has now been succeeded by Judge Christopher Robert Wolfe, the legal community is closely monitoring potential shifts in the court’s handling…
Ralph’s Famous Italian Ices Franchise Corp. has encountered a setback in its attempt to trademark its recognizable blue-and-white vertical stripe pattern. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) delivered a precedential judgment, asserting that the pattern is too ubiquitous across the frozen-dessert, beverage, and restaurant sectors for it to merit trademark protection. This ruling underscores…
Hyundai Motor Co. is resolute in defending a $2.5 million trademark infringement verdict by a jury, amidst efforts by Hyundai Technology to secure a new trial. The automotive giant contends that the technology company’s actions have led to significant consumer confusion, a point underscored by the jury’s recent decision. In a motion submitted to a…
Recent developments within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) shed light on the factors influencing inter partes review (IPR) decisions. A key order articulated by USPTO Director John Squires in Magnolia Medical Technologies Inc. v. Kurin Inc., underscores critical aspects that legal professionals should consider in navigating the patent review landscape. The first decisive…
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) recently determined that an apparel company’s attempt to trademark “Wemby” implied an unauthorized affiliation with Victor Wembanyama of the NBA’s San Antonio Spurs. This decision underscores the Board’s commitment to protecting personal rights and integrity against the misuse of celebrity identities. The term “Wemby,” recognized widely as Wembanyama’s…
Apple’s recent setbacks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) highlight the crucial role of consistent legal argumentation. On Wednesday, USPTO Director John Squires rejected Apple’s attempts to invalidate patents related to electronics with memory chips. The decision centered on Apple presenting conflicting arguments before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and in…
In a significant development for intellectual property law within sports, the Eleventh Circuit has reinvigorated the United States All Star Federation’s (USASF) legal battle over the trademark for its flagship event. The lawsuit involves allegations that a competitor appropriated the name of its signature competitive cheerleading event, “Worlds.” This case revisits complex issues surrounding trademark…
The long-standing tensions within the National Rifle Association (NRA) surfaced anew recently when a federal judge ruled to preserve certain aspects of the organization’s trademark claims. On June 24, 2026, the District of Columbia federal judge decided to let the NRA’s trademark claims proceed against its own charitable arm, the NRA Foundation. This decision maintains…
In a recent decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has denied TextNow Inc.’s attempt to register the trademark “Touch Mobile” for its phone and wireless messaging services. This refusal stems from a concern over the likelihood of confusion with the existing “Mobile Touch” trademark. The ruling underscores the challenge businesses face when attempting…
The Eamon Foundation, which owns the rights to the “Terrible Towel” trademarks linked to the Pittsburgh Steelers and the late broadcaster Myron Cope, has launched a legal battle against a Connecticut auto accessory seller. This case, filed in a Pennsylvania federal court, centers on allegations that the company is illegally marketing and selling products featuring…
In a recent decision by a federal judge in Louisiana, Nike has emerged unscathed in a trademark dispute over the use of the “Total 90” brand. The decision came after a company, which had registered the trademark for “Total 90,” sought to bar the athletic gear giant from using it. Central to the judge’s decision…
In a recent development in the high-profile trademark dispute between lifestyle brand Impossible X and plant-based burger company Impossible Foods, the former is seeking to uphold a $3.25 million verdict awarded in its favor by a federal court in California. Decision-makers at Impossible X argue that Impossible Foods is attempting to rehash previously resolved issues…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under Director John Squires has announced a shift in policy, allowing for reviews of patents under what it terms “exceptional circumstances.” This decision emerges after a controversial decision to retract the review of patents held by Evolution Malta Ltd., a key player in the online gambling sector. The…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced a significant change in its policy regarding delays in filing documents related to patents. Previously, patent applicants had a two-year period to file certain documents without needing to provide an explanation for any delays. The revised rule now requires that any delay exceeding one year must…
Bogg Bag Inc., renowned for its distinctive tote bags, has initiated legal proceedings against Great Wolf Lodge, alleging trademark infringement. The complaint, filed in the Eastern District Court, claims that Great Wolf Lodge’s new line of tote bags mimics Bogg Bag’s signature design features, including its recognizable patterned holes and zigzag lines here. This lawsuit…
“`html The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in a 6-3 decision that immigration officers are not obligated to present clear and convincing evidence of a crime involving moral turpitude committed by a returning lawful permanent resident (LPR) before treating them as an applicant for admission. This decision in Blanche v. Lau overturned a prior…
In a recent legal development, fintech company Advent Software initiated a trademark infringement lawsuit against Advent AI, an artificial intelligence firm. The suit, filed in federal court, argues that the name similarity between Advent Software and Advent AI may result in consumer confusion, potentially infringing on established brand recognition and market presence. The core of…
In its recent order list, the Supreme Court revealed a number of decisions and petitions that have significant implications for multiple areas of law. Notably, the Court has added a new case to its docket for the next term, focusing on citizens’ ability to sue federal officials in instances where no explicit legal authorization currently…
The ongoing legal battle between the “Mormon Stories” podcast and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has taken a new turn as the podcast host requested a Utah federal judge to dismiss the church’s copyright and trademark infringement lawsuit. The central argument is that the LDS Church lacks the legal authority to control…
In its latest round of decisions, the Supreme Court has declined to hear a series of cases that legal professionals and policymakers were closely watching. These cases encompassed key issues such as voting rights, environmental regulations, and intellectual property disputes. The court’s decisions were revealed in a list of orders from their June 18 conference,…
Pocketec Inc., a company known for its innovative golf gloves, has filed a lawsuit claiming that its former business partner engaged in a scheme to misappropriate its intellectual property. The allegations suggest that the ex-partner, along with other unnamed defendants, used similar trademarks to sell competing golf gloves, which has led to significant concern within…
U.S. investment firm Ares is currently embroiled in a legal dispute involving the use of the trademark “Marq Logistics.” Allegations have surfaced claiming that Ares attempted to capitalize on the success of a London-based real estate company by employing a similar trademark. In response, the firm has defended its position, stating that the U.K. business…